What's the sense in which A_\infty algebras are "deformable"? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-25T21:35:55Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/181http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/181/whats-the-sense-in-which-a-infty-algebras-are-deformableWhat's the sense in which A_\infty algebras are "deformable"?Scott Morrison2009-10-07T20:30:05Z2009-10-09T15:38:23Z
<p>I realise this is a very vague question! I've heard people say that A<sub>∞</sub> algebras are the right homotopy-theoretic generalization of usual associative algebras, because you can deform them. What exactly does this mean?</p>
<p>This roughly makes sense -- if you "deform" an associative algebra, it's generically going to stop being associative, but it will be "associative up to homotopy" in exactly the sense A<sub>∞</sub> algebras are.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/181/whats-the-sense-in-which-a-infty-algebras-are-deformable/218#218Answer by Mikael Vejdemo-Johansson for What's the sense in which A_\infty algebras are "deformable"?Mikael Vejdemo-Johansson2009-10-09T06:08:03Z2009-10-09T06:08:03Z<p>Further on the A-infinity operad - it is what we get if we do the "obvious" moves to introduce a homological algebra on operads, and then look for a free dg-operad quasi-isomorphic to the associative operad. In that sense, the A-infinity operad is just the "free resolution" of associative algebras, and therefore a sensible homotopy equivalent replacement for the original operad.</p>
<p>(reposting since something got wonky with my account and login)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/181/whats-the-sense-in-which-a-infty-algebras-are-deformable/226#226Answer by James Griffin for What's the sense in which A_\infty algebras are "deformable"?James Griffin2009-10-09T15:38:23Z2009-10-09T15:38:23Z<p>Well here's my shot: (skip to the punchline at the bottom if you want)</p>
<p>Take an associative algebra A and a k-local ring R (the formal power series over k, or the infinitesimal ring will do nicely).</p>
<p>The algebra A is naturally a homotopy algebra and so may be given by a degree -1 square-zero coderivative on the free coassociative coalgebra on A[1]. We write this coalgebra BA, the bar resolution. Note that in homotopy theory it often makes life easier if we forget any unit elements; BA is non-unital.</p>
<p>An A-infty R-deformation of A is now a square-zero coderivative on the coalgebra BA⊗R, such that the "obvious" diagram commutes (I could post this as an image when I'm permitted). The condition could alternatively by phrased as the following:
"such that it extends the original coderivative on BA".</p>
<p>So far this has all been definitions, my answer to your question comes next:
Consider now the cobar functor applied to the morphism BA⊗R→BA,</p>
<p>Ω(BA⊗R) ≅ (ΩBA)⊗R → ΩBA.</p>
<p>This is a proper algebra deformation, nothing infinity about it! Except... ΩBA is homotopy equivalent to A.</p>
<p>The short and snappy answer:</p>
<h2>Infinity deformations are homotopy invariant, classical algebra deformations are not.</h2>
<p>Edit: I should have added, if you would like me to expand on anything, I'm more than willing.</p>