A historical question: Hurwitz, Luroth, Clebsch, and the connectedness of M_g - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T14:59:05Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/17697http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/17697/a-historical-question-hurwitz-luroth-clebsch-and-the-connectedness-of-m-gA historical question: Hurwitz, Luroth, Clebsch, and the connectedness of M_gJSE2010-03-10T04:57:43Z2010-03-10T17:50:21Z
<p>The connectedness of the moduli space M_g of complex algebraic curves of genus g can be proven by showing that it is dominated by a Hurwitz space of simply branched d-fold covers of the line, which in turn can be shown to be connected by proving the transitivity of the the natural action of the braid group on n-tuples of transpositions in S_n with product 1, which generate S_n: in this action, a generator sigma_i of the braid group acts as</p>
<p>(g_1, ... g_n) -> (g_1, ... g_{i+1}, g_i^{g_{i+1}}, g_{i+2}, ..., g_n).</p>
<p>This argument is often referred to as "a theorem of Clebsch (1872 or 1873), Luroth (1871), and Hurwitz (1891)." Does anyone know the history of this argument more precisely, and in particular which parts are due to Luroth, which to Clebsch, and which to Hurwitz? </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17697/a-historical-question-hurwitz-luroth-clebsch-and-the-connectedness-of-m-g/17703#17703Answer by Alon Amit for A historical question: Hurwitz, Luroth, Clebsch, and the connectedness of M_gAlon Amit2010-03-10T08:10:11Z2010-03-10T08:10:11Z<p>Does <a href="http://math.uci.edu/~mfried/deflist-cov/Hurwitz-Spaces.html" rel="nofollow">this</a> help a little?</p>
<p>"In a 1891 paper, Hurwitz explains how the set of degree d simple covers (all fibers consist of at least d-1 points) P1 (the projective line – Riemann sphere) has a structure of complex manifold. In this he follows a much earlier (1867) paper of Clebsch who showed the connectedness of the space of simple covers. Hurwitz's paper thereby applies to show the connectedness of the moduli space of compact surfaces of genus g."</p>
<p>If nothing else this may point you to folks who may know (Pierre Debes and Mike Fried).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17697/a-historical-question-hurwitz-luroth-clebsch-and-the-connectedness-of-m-g/17741#17741Answer by David Lehavi for A historical question: Hurwitz, Luroth, Clebsch, and the connectedness of M_gDavid Lehavi2010-03-10T17:50:21Z2010-03-10T17:50:21Z<p>Harris and Morrison point you (after stating the theorem in 1.5.4) to Clebsch's <a href="http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/en/dms/load/img/?PPN=PPN235181684_0006&DMDID=dmdlog23" rel="nofollow">Zur Theorie der Rieman'schen Flachen</a> <a href="http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/en/dms/load/img/?PPN=PPN235181684_0006" rel="nofollow">Math Ann. 6</a> 216-230, 1872. My Germen is not that good, but section 2 seems convincing.</p>