Why is "h" the notation for class numbers? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-23T03:42:49Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/17062 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17062/why-is-h-the-notation-for-class-numbers Why is "h" the notation for class numbers? KConrad 2010-03-04T06:27:14Z 2010-03-06T00:06:03Z <p>A student asked me why $\mathcal{O}_K$ is the notation used for the ring of integers in a number field $K$ and why $h$ is the notation for class numbers. I was able to tell him the origin of $\mathcal{O}$ (from Dedekind's use of Ordnung, the German word for order, which was taken from taxonomy in the same way the words class and genus had been stolen for math usage before him), but I was stumped by $h$. Does anyone out there know how $h$ got adopted? </p> <p>I have a copy of Dirichlet's lecture notes on number theory (the ones Dedekind edited with his famous supplements laying out the theory of ideals), and in there he is using $h$. So this convention goes back at least to Dirichlet -- or maybe Dedekind? -- but is that where the notation starts? And even if so, why the letter $h$? </p> <p>I had jokingly suggested to the student that $h$ was for Hilbert, but I then told him right away it made no historical sense (Hilbert being too late chronologically).</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17062/why-is-h-the-notation-for-class-numbers/17063#17063 Answer by Mariano Suárez-Alvarez for Why is "h" the notation for class numbers? Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2010-03-04T07:22:36Z 2010-03-04T07:34:32Z <p>F. Cajori gives several pointers in his <em>A history of mathematical notations</em>, Vol. 2, page 40. I think (he's a bit unclear...) he attributes the notation to Kronecker, referring to Dickson's <em>History</em>, Vol. 3, page 93. Dickson, in turn, in page 138 of that volume, tells us that Kronecker uses that notation in [Sitzungsberichte Akad. d. Wissensch. (Berlin, 1885), Vol. II, p. 768-80]</p> <p>He apparently had introduced numbers $F(d)$, $G(d)$, $E(d)$, and when he needed one more, he used $H$ :P</p> <p>(Reading on, we find the first appearence of a lowercase $h$ in Dickson referring to a paper of Weber (Göttingen Nachr., 1893, 138--147, 263--4), so---since Dickson uses notation from the papers he is quoting, we can blame Weber for the change of case)</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17062/why-is-h-the-notation-for-class-numbers/17064#17064 Answer by Olivier for Why is "h" the notation for class numbers? Olivier 2010-03-04T07:47:19Z 2010-03-04T07:47:19Z <p>I had always thought that it stood for Haupt (principal) because ideals become principal after being raised at the power $h$. However, I don't have any historical reference.</p> http://mathoverflow.net/questions/17062/why-is-h-the-notation-for-class-numbers/17098#17098 Answer by Franz Lemmermeyer for Why is "h" the notation for class numbers? Franz Lemmermeyer 2010-03-04T15:39:56Z 2010-03-04T15:39:56Z <p>Gauss, in his Disquisitiones, used ad hoc notation for the class number when he needed it. He did not use h. Dirichlet used h for the class number in 1838 when he proved the class number formula for binary quadratic forms. I somewhat doubt that he was thinking of "Hauptform" in this connection - back then, the group structure was not as omnipresent as it is today, and the result that $Q^h$ is the principal form was known (and written additively), but did not play any role. Kummer, 10 years later, used H for the class number of the field of p-th roots of unity, and h for the class number of a subfield generated by Gaussiam periods (and "proved" that $h \mid H$); in the introduction he quotes Dirichlet's work on forms at length.</p>