Geometrically interpreting the answer to a vector calculus question involving tangent line segments to ellipses. - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T03:36:07Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/16691http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/16691/geometrically-interpreting-the-answer-to-a-vector-calculus-question-involving-tanGeometrically interpreting the answer to a vector calculus question involving tangent line segments to ellipses.Khalid Bou-Rabee2010-02-28T16:11:49Z2010-02-28T23:20:07Z
<p>Let E be an <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ellipse" rel="nofollow">ellipse</a> centered at the origin on the x, y plane with major radius b and minor radius a. The length of the shortest line segment tangent to E that begins on the x-axis and ends on the y-axis is a+b. This can be shown using Lagrange multipliers. This answer is very simple and leads us to ask the following question:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Can you give a geometric reason for why the length is a+b?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This was originally asked to me by Frank Jones a few years ago.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16691/geometrically-interpreting-the-answer-to-a-vector-calculus-question-involving-tan/16716#16716Answer by Jonas Meyer for Geometrically interpreting the answer to a vector calculus question involving tangent line segments to ellipses.Jonas Meyer2010-02-28T21:19:56Z2010-02-28T23:20:07Z<p>By working simultaneously in the 4 quadrants, this becomes a question of minimizing the perimeter of enclosing rhombi with diagonals on the coordinate axes. Proving the inequality was <a href="http://www.math.purdue.edu/pow/" rel="nofollow">Problem of the Week</a> No. 13 in Spring 2005 at Purdue. Here is <a href="http://www.math.purdue.edu/pow/spring2005/pdf/solution13.pdf" rel="nofollow">Steven Landy's solution</a> to the problem. The proof is geometric in the sense of Descartes rather than Euclid, and shows that the minimum is at least a+b. There's no calculus, so maybe this is close to what you're looking for. (<strong>Edit:</strong> I entertained the delusion that this might be close to answering your question only before akopyan's answer was posted.)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16691/geometrically-interpreting-the-answer-to-a-vector-calculus-question-involving-tan/16718#16718Answer by akopyan for Geometrically interpreting the answer to a vector calculus question involving tangent line segments to ellipses.akopyan2010-02-28T22:01:19Z2010-02-28T22:10:11Z<p>There is a geometric way to show that $n$-gon circumscribed around an ellipse has minimal perimeter if it is inscribed in a confocal ellipse. From Poncelet porism (and generalization of optical property) it follows that we have continuous family of "minimal" polygons.</p>
<p>If we know it, then it is easy to understand that the circumscribed rhomb (from your question) and the circumscribed rectangular (with perimeter $4(a+b)$) are minimal polygons. So, side of the rhomb equals $a+b$.</p>