what is summation in the sense of a principal value? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T13:18:27Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/16066http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/16066/what-is-summation-in-the-sense-of-a-principal-valuewhat is summation in the sense of a principal value?vilvarin2010-02-22T16:19:32Z2010-02-23T11:49:09Z
<p>In one paper I saw this equality:</p>
<p>$$\sum_{\eta=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{z}{(z+\eta)}=\pi z\cot(\pi z)$$
which is the same as
$$\sum_{\eta=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{(z+\eta)}=\pi \cot(\pi z)$$
where summation is understood in the sense of a principal value. What does it mean?</p>
<p>In another paper I found the next expression:</p>
<p>$$\frac{\exp(2\pi iaz)}{\exp(2\pi iz)-1}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(2\pi ina)}{z-n}$$
for $a=0$ it is equivalent to
$$\frac{1}{\exp(2\pi iz)-1}=\frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{z+n}$$
which is not exactly the same expression like in the first case.
$$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{z+n}=\pi Cot[\pi z]-i\pi$$</p>
<p>Where is my mistake? </p>
<p>If the second formula is wrong, what is the correct formula for the second case?
$$\sum_{n=-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{\exp(2\pi ina)}{z+n}=?$$</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16066/what-is-summation-in-the-sense-of-a-principal-value/16067#16067Answer by L Spice for what is summation in the sense of a principal value?L Spice2010-02-22T16:24:10Z2010-02-22T17:11:10Z<p>A principal-value sum (or integral) is usually one in which unconditional summation (or integration) does not converge, so one needs to sum in a particular way to achieve convergence. I suspect that, in this case, the necessary summation is symmetric, so that we consider <code>$\lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n = -N}^{n = N} f(n)$</code> instead of <code>$\sum_{n = 1}^\infty f(-n) + \sum_{n = 0}^\infty f(n)$</code>.</p>
<p><strike>It's not quite clear to me what your issue is with the two formulæ you mention. Since you are summing different functions ($1/(z + n)$ versus $z/(z + n)$), it is no surprise that the answers are different. What am I missing?</strike> (Sorry, I did not notice that you had already factored out the $z$.)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/16066/what-is-summation-in-the-sense-of-a-principal-value/16072#16072Answer by Harald Hanche-Olsen for what is summation in the sense of a principal value?Harald Hanche-Olsen2010-02-22T17:19:04Z2010-02-22T17:19:04Z<p>See the answer of L Spice for the principal value bit.</p>
<p>For the second bit, the formula from the second paper is rather suspect. For example, $a=1/2$ produces the divergent sum (even in the principal value sense) <code>$$\sum_{n=-\infty}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{z-n}.$$</code> And for your case $a=0$, $z=1/2$ yields <code>$\sum(z-n)^{-1}=0$</code> by symmetry, so the formula cannot be right then either.</p>