free homotopy groups -- when do they exist? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T10:05:53Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/1600http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/1600/free-homotopy-groups-when-do-they-existfree homotopy groups -- when do they exist?Aaron Mazel-Gee2009-10-21T07:29:41Z2009-11-19T20:18:03Z
<p>Let (X,x) be a pointed space. There is an action of π<sub>1</sub>(X,x) on π<sub>n</sub>(X,x) -- determined by considering π<sub>n</sub>(X,x)=π<sub>n-1</sub>(Ω<sub>x</sub>X,<b>x</b>), where Ω<sub>x</sub>X denotes the space of loops in X based at x, and <b>x</b> denotes the constant loop -- given simply by conjugation. We can speak unambiguously of π<sub>n</sub>(X), the <i>free</i> (i.e., not necessarily basepoint-preserving) homotopy group exactly when this action is trivial.</p>
<p>On an algebraic level I'm fine with this, but I'm having trouble envisioning how a homotopy class might be conjugated to a different homotopy class in this way. Besides my admittedly small collection of toy examples, my issue could also be that I'm mainly thinking about π<sub>1</sub>, in which case it might (???) be that the action <i>is</i> trivial. (I seem to recall that before learning about general homotopy theory, I heard a statement along the lines of "for path-connected spaces, you may as well ignore basepoints". Certainly the groups are all isomorphic, but I'm not certain whether there is a unique natural isomorphism.)</p>
<p>Also, are there (necessary and/or sufficient) conditions for when the π<sub>1</sub> action on π<sub>n</sub> will or won't be trivial, and does this depend on n?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1600/free-homotopy-groups-when-do-they-exist/1603#1603Answer by Oscar Randal-Williams for free homotopy groups -- when do they exist?Oscar Randal-Williams2009-10-21T07:42:51Z2009-10-21T07:42:51Z<p>If you are thinking about π<sub>1</sub>, the action is just that by conjugation in this group, so is trivial iff the fundamental group is abelian.</p>
<p>I think the easist place to see the nontriviality of this action in higher dimensions is for the space S<sup>1</sup> v S<sup>n</sup>. By considering its universal cover and using Hurewicz's theorem, one can see that π<sub>n</sub> = Z[t, t<sup>-1</sup>] (= Z<sup>infty</sup>), the ring of Laurent polynomials in a single variable t (as an additive group). You must then exercise the imagination to convince yourself that 1 in Z = π<sub>1</sub> acts as multiplication by t.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1600/free-homotopy-groups-when-do-they-exist/1660#1660Answer by Charles Rezk for free homotopy groups -- when do they exist?Charles Rezk2009-10-21T14:16:26Z2009-10-21T14:16:26Z<p>For the last part of your question: given a group π<sub>1</sub> which acts on an abelian group π<sub>n</sub>, there is always as space X with these homotopy groups with this action, and you can manufacture one using Eilenberg-MacLane spaces. You can make the group π<sub>1</sub> act on the Eilenberg-MacLane space K(π<sub>n</sub>,n) in such a way that realizes the action on π<sub>n</sub>, and then use this to build a space as a fibration X-->K(π<sub>1</sub>,1) with fiber K(π<sub>n</sub>,n). So the only general limitation is in how the group π<sub>1</sub> can act on the group π<sub>n</sub>.</p>
<p>There is one condition on a space X which implies the action is trivial: if X is a loop space (i.e., X is homotopy equivalent to ΩY for some Y), then the action of π<sub>1</sub>(X) on π<sub>n</sub>(X) is always trivial; the idea is that ΩX=Ω<sup>2</sup>Y, in which loop composition is commutative up to homotopy.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1600/free-homotopy-groups-when-do-they-exist/1665#1665Answer by Andy Putman for free homotopy groups -- when do they exist?Andy Putman2009-10-21T14:35:53Z2009-10-21T14:35:53Z<p>Just to make explicit what was implicit in the above answers -- while pi_1(X,v) is isomorphic to pi_1(X,w) for all v and w, the isomorphism depends on a choice of path from v to w. This isomorphism will be natural in the sense that it is independent of this choice of path if and only if pi_1(X) is abelian.</p>