Which surfaces can be completely defined by a single parameterization? - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T12:52:40Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/120733http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/120733/which-surfaces-can-be-completely-defined-by-a-single-parameterizationWhich surfaces can be completely defined by a single parameterization?pritam2013-02-04T06:46:05Z2013-02-04T07:09:49Z
<p>It can be easily shown that any closed and bounded surface of $\mathbb{R}^3$ cannot be covered by a single surface patch, i.e. cannot be homeomorphic to an open set of $\mathbb{R}^2$. What can be said about the non-compact surfaces? Is it possible to characterize all the surfaces of $\mathbb{R}^3$ which are homeomorphic to an open set of $\mathbb{R}^2$?</p>