Old books still used - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T16:31:42Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/117415http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-usedOld books still usedLennart Meier2012-12-28T16:24:04Z2013-04-21T02:11:21Z
<p>It's a commonplace to state that while other sciences (like biology) may always need the newest books, we mathematicians also use to use older books. While this is a qualitative remark, I would like to get a quantitative result. So what are "old" books still used?</p>
<p>Coming from (algebraic) topology, the first things which come to my mind are the works by Milnor. Frequently used (also as a topic for seminars) are his <em>Characteristic Classes</em> (1974, but based on lectures from 1957), his <em>Morse Theory</em> (1963) and other books and articles by him from the mid sixties. </p>
<p>An older book, which is sometimes used, is Steenrod's <em>The Topology of Fibre Bundles</em> from 1951, but this feels a bit dated already. Books older than that in topology are usually only read for historic reasons. </p>
<p>As I have only very limited experience in other fields (except, perhaps, in algebraic geometry), my question is: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>What are the oldest books regularly used in your field (and which don't feel "outdated")? </p>
</blockquote>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117417#117417Answer by Abdelmalek Abdesselam for Old books still usedAbdelmalek Abdesselam2012-12-28T16:33:39Z2012-12-28T16:53:38Z<p>If one needs to use tools from classical invariant theory or elimination theory then some books that come to mind are:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Grace and Young <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=PhoPAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false" rel="nofollow">"The Algebra of Invariants"</a>, 1903.</p></li>
<li><p>Elliott <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=Az5tAAAAMAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false" rel="nofollow">"An Introduction to The Algebra of Quantics"</a>,
1913.</p></li>
<li><p>Salmon <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=NJ0KAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false" rel="nofollow">"Lessons Introductory to The Modern Higher Algebra"</a>, 1876.</p></li>
<li><p>Faa di Bruno <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=gDIAAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false" rel="nofollow">"Théorie Des Formes Binaires"</a>, 1876.</p></li>
<li><p>Faa di Bruno <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=QflACY8TFnQC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false" rel="nofollow">"Théorie Générale de l'Elimination"</a>, 1859.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>and there are quite a few more.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117418#117418Answer by Alberto García-Raboso for Old books still usedAlberto García-Raboso2012-12-28T16:37:19Z2012-12-28T16:37:19Z<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89l%C3%A9ments_de_g%C3%A9om%C3%A9trie_alg%C3%A9brique" rel="nofollow">EGA</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S%C3%A9minaire_de_G%C3%A9om%C3%A9trie_Alg%C3%A9brique_du_Bois_Marie" rel="nofollow">SGA</a>, both from the 1960s and 1970s, are very widely used in algebraic geometry. <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3rtX9t-nnvwC" rel="nofollow">Hartshorne's textbook</a> (first published in 1977) is still the main choice for courses on the theory of schemes.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117419#117419Answer by Alberto García-Raboso for Old books still usedAlberto García-Raboso2012-12-28T16:50:27Z2012-12-31T21:27:56Z<p>Meet the Rudins: <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/Principles_of_mathematical_analysis.html?id=iifvAAAAMAAJ" rel="nofollow"><em>Baby</em> Rudin</a> (first published in 1953), <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/Real_and_complex_analysis.html?id=Z_fuAAAAMAAJ" rel="nofollow"><em>Papa</em> Rudin</a> (whose oldest copyright I've been able to find dates back to 1966) and <a href="http://books.google.com/books/about/Functional_analysis.html?id=Sh_vAAAAMAAJ" rel="nofollow"><em>Grandaddy</em> Rudin</a> (1973 is the oldest reference I've found).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117421#117421Answer by András Bátkai for Old books still usedAndrás Bátkai2012-12-28T17:09:30Z2012-12-28T17:29:01Z<p>Sz. Nagy-Foias: <a href="http://books.google.hu/books/about/Harmonic_analysis_of_operators_on_Hilber.html?id=ZmpYAAAAYAAJ&redir_esc=y" rel="nofollow">Harmonic Analysis of Operators in Hilbert Space</a> (1970) is a still widely used and lively book (though there is a new updated edition in 2012).</p>
<p>T. Kato's <a href="http://books.google.hu/books/about/Perturbation_theory_for_linear_operators.html?id=IvVQAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y" rel="nofollow">Perturbation Theory book</a> (1967) is also definitely in this category, though there is a 1980 second edition and a 1995 reprint.</p>
<p>Nelson Dunford, Jacob T. Schwartz: <a href="http://books.google.hu/books?id=4LQdAQAAMAAJ" rel="nofollow">Linear Operators</a> (1958,1963, 1971). I still take this book regularly into my hands. </p>
<p>An other reference on differential equations is</p>
<p>J. L. Lions, E. Magenes: <a href="http://books.google.hu/books/about/Non_Homogeneous_Boundary_Value_Problems.html?id=n7NTQwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y" rel="nofollow">Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems</a>, 1972. It is still "the" reference.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117422#117422Answer by Denis Serre for Old books still usedDenis Serre2012-12-28T17:22:01Z2013-01-07T10:01:43Z<p>That depends if you speak of research books or <strong>advanced</strong> text book. In the second category, I should place</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Rudin's <em>Real and complex analysis</em> (1966),</p></li>
<li><p>J.-P. Serre's <em>Cours d'Arithmétique</em> (1970) (hope you will forgive me),</p></li>
<li><p>Lang's <em>Algebra</em> (1st Edt 1965).</p></li>
</ul>
<p>In the first category, I see</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Kato's <em>Perturbation theory of linear operators</em> (1966),</p></li>
<li><p>Courant & Hilbert's <em>Methods of Mathematical Physics</em> (1924),</p></li>
<li><p>Courant & Friedrich's <em>Supersonic Flow and Shock Waves</em> (1948),</p></li>
<li><p>V. I. Arnold's <em>Mathematical methods of classical mechanics</em> (1974).</p></li>
</ul>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117424#117424Answer by Alexandre Eremenko for Old books still usedAlexandre Eremenko2012-12-28T17:29:26Z2013-01-09T23:48:02Z<p>I think the absolute record (excluding Euclid) belongs to</p>
<blockquote>
<p>E. T. Whittaker G. H. Watson, A course of modern analysis.
According to Jahrbuch database, the first edition is 1915.
Moreover, this 1915 edition was an extended version of a 1902 book,
by Whittaker alone.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>The last revision 1927.
The book is still in print, and widely used, not only by mathematicians
but by physicists and engineers.
Soon we will celebrate the centennary... It has 1056 citations on Mathscinet, by the way, and 8866 on the Google Scholar !</p>
<p>Perhaps this deserves a Guinnes book of record entry as a "textbook longest continuously in print".
And I suppose this is a record not only for math but for all sciences...
with the exception of Euclid and Ptolemy, of course:-)</p>
<p>If we include not only textbooks but research monographs there are plenty of other examples, even
older ones:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>H. F. Baker, Abelian functions, was first published in 1897. Rerinted in 1995, and there is a new
Russian translation.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Just out of curiosity, look at its current citation rate in Mathscinet:-)</p>
<p>They also reprinted</p>
<blockquote>
<p>H. Schubert, Kalkül der abzählenden Geometrie, 1879, in 1979, and again you can see from Mathscinet
that people are using this.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>EDIT: A brief inspection of the most cited (and thus most used) books on Mathscinet shows that
a very large proportion of the most cited books are 30-40 years old.
Which is easy to explain, by the way. Thus on my opinion, such books do not qualify for this list
(unless we want to make it infinite).</p>
<p>EDIT2: Today I accidentally found that 3 of the 4 copies of</p>
<blockquote>
<p>G. H. Watson, Treatise on the theory of Bessel functions (first edition, 1922)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>are checked out from my university library.
Mathscinet shows 1157 citations for the last 2 editions.</p>
<p>Another question is old papers which are still highly sited. A typical life span of a paper is much
smaller than that of a book. In the list of 100 most cited papers in 2011, I found only two papers
published before 1950 (One by Shannon and another by Leray).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117425#117425Answer by Aaron Meyerowitz for Old books still usedAaron Meyerowitz2012-12-28T17:30:00Z2012-12-28T17:30:00Z<p>I've used Euclid's Elements</p>
<p>Halmos (several)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117426#117426Answer by ayanta for Old books still usedayanta2012-12-28T17:40:09Z2012-12-28T17:40:09Z<p>The notes of the 1951-2 Artin-Tate seminar on class field theory (published in 1968, and re-issued in LaTeX form a few years ago with a new Introduction by Tate addressing subsequent developments) remains a fundamental reference in algebraic number theory, despite the abundant supply of more recent references on the subject. </p>
<p>One reason is that it is the only reference outside the original research literature where one can find a complete treatment (with proofs) of certain key aspects of the theory such as the Grunwald-Wang phenomenon and Weil groups for class formations (especially the case of number fields, which lacks a bare-hands construction as for local fields and global function fields). Come to think of it, the general notion of Weil groups for class formations emerged from that seminar...The style of the proofs remains generally quite fresh.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117428#117428Answer by Mariano Suárez-Alvarez for Old books still usedMariano Suárez-Alvarez2012-12-28T17:49:24Z2012-12-28T17:49:24Z<p>Henri Cartan and Samuel Eilenberg published their <em>Homological Algebra</em> in 1956, although it was famously circulated for a long time before that. While that book more or less founded its subject, it is still quite useful. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117430#117430Answer by Goldstern for Old books still usedGoldstern2012-12-28T17:54:47Z2012-12-28T17:54:47Z<p>van der Waerden's <em>Moderne Algebra</em> was first published in 1930, I think. I use the book occasionally for my course, but am not sure which edition. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117431#117431Answer by Robert Bryant for Old books still usedRobert Bryant2012-12-28T17:58:04Z2012-12-28T17:58:04Z<p>Gaston Darboux' magnum opus <em>Leçons sur la Théorie générale des Surfaces et les Applications géométriques du Calcul infinitésimal</em> (first edition 1890, I think; there is a second edition dating from around 1915) is still read by many differential geometers, and, as far as I know, it is still in print via the AMS Chelsea series.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117438#117438Answer by alvarezpaiva for Old books still usedalvarezpaiva2012-12-28T19:31:02Z2012-12-28T22:11:06Z<p>In metric geometry Busemann's "The Geometry of Geodesics" (1955) is still wonderful reading. This book is now published by Dover. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117442#117442Answer by Benjamin Steinberg for Old books still usedBenjamin Steinberg2012-12-28T21:11:45Z2012-12-28T22:10:18Z<p>Artin's Galois theory (1942) is still a classic. People in automata theory and finite semigroups still use Samuel Eilenberg's two volumes on the subject (1974). </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117445#117445Answer by brunoh for Old books still usedbrunoh2012-12-28T21:43:01Z2012-12-28T21:43:01Z<p>I would like to add the nine volumes of the "Treatise on Analysis" of Jean Dieudonné (in French, "Éléments d'Analyse") which is quite thorough with beautiful exercises (unfortunately some of them contain errors or wrong hints) and give a broad view of contemporary aspects of Analysis, still useful nowadays especially the ninth & last volume (they were published in the 70s and 80s I think). Written with a flavor of Bourbaki, it gives the right level of generality (not too much, usually using only locally compact metrizable groups) and the numerous exercises really help to master maim results and methods of proof. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117447#117447Answer by Timothy Chow for Old books still usedTimothy Chow2012-12-28T22:03:35Z2012-12-31T01:52:23Z<p>Abramowitz and Stegun's <i>Handbook of Mathematical Functions</i> (1964) is still used. As the August 2011 <i>Notices</i> article by Boisvert et al. says, </p>
<blockquote>
<p>The <i>Handbook</i> remains highly relevant today
in spite of its age. In 2009, for example, the Web
of Science records more than 2,000 citations to
the <i>Handbook</i>. That is more than one published
paper every five hours—quite remarkable!</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In time it might be superseded by the <i>NIST Handbook of Mathematical Functions</i> (or its online version, the <a href="http://dlmf.nist.gov/" rel="nofollow">Digital Library of Mathematical Functions</a>), but not yet.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117451#117451Answer by Joseph Van Name for Old books still usedJoseph Van Name2012-12-28T22:20:23Z2012-12-28T23:21:23Z<p>Most good books in general topology are old. Here are some good topology books that I often refer to.</p>
<p><em>rings of continuous functions</em> by Gillman and Jerison (1960)</p>
<p><em>Uniform Spaces</em> by John Isbell (1964)</p>
<p><em>General Topology</em> by Stephen Willard (1970)</p>
<p><em>Topology</em> by James Dugundji (1966)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117452#117452Answer by Adeel for Old books still usedAdeel2012-12-28T22:22:44Z2012-12-28T22:22:44Z<p>Mac Lane's "Categories for the working mathematician" (1971).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117465#117465Answer by Amritanshu Prasad for Old books still usedAmritanshu Prasad2012-12-29T01:30:55Z2012-12-29T01:30:55Z<p>I used G. H. Hardy's <em>A Course of Pure Mathematics</em> (First edition 1908) when I taught undergraduate real analysis not so long ago. The care with which concepts are explained and the number of interesting problems and examples is, in my opinion, unmatched by newer books.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117469#117469Answer by Daniel McLaury for Old books still usedDaniel McLaury2012-12-29T02:43:42Z2012-12-29T02:43:42Z<p>If computer science counts as math, then The Art of Computer Programming (first volume published 1968) would be a good example of a text that's still in wide use.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117471#117471Answer by Rodrigo A. Pérez for Old books still usedRodrigo A. Pérez2012-12-29T03:14:54Z2012-12-29T03:14:54Z<p>Ahlfors' <em>Complex Analysis</em>. The 3rd edition is from 1978, but the book itself was written in the 50s. No other book comes close.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117479#117479Answer by Anthony Quas for Old books still usedAnthony Quas2012-12-29T05:49:11Z2012-12-29T05:49:11Z<p>I'm amazed no one has mentioned Hardy and Wright's wonderful Introduction to the Theory of Numbers. It was first published in 1938 and is absolutely delightful.</p>
<p>The most recent (6th) edition includes a chapter on elliptic curves.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117483#117483Answer by Chandan Singh Dalawat for Old books still usedChandan Singh Dalawat2012-12-29T07:12:53Z2013-01-07T05:20:04Z<p>I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned Serre's <em>Corps locaux</em> (Local Fields), his <em>Cohomologie galoisienne</em> (Galois cohomology) and his <em>Représentations linéaires des groupes finis</em> (Linear representations of finite groups). </p>
<p>Other eternal texts in Number Theory include Artin's <em>Algebraic numbers and algebraic functions</em> and the Artin-Tate notes on <em>Class field theory</em>, Hasse's <em>Zahlentheorie</em> and his <em>Klassenkörperbericht</em>, Hecke's <em>Vorlesungen über die Theorie der Algebraischen Zahlen</em>, Weyl's <em>Algebraic Theory of Numbers</em>, and Hilbert's <em>Zahlbericht</em>. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117484#117484Answer by Kevin R. Vixie for Old books still usedKevin R. Vixie2012-12-29T07:24:29Z2012-12-29T07:24:29Z<p>The standard, go to reference in geometric measure theory is still Federer's 1969 classic, <em>Geometric Measure Theory</em>. It is very rarely the first reference one uses since it is rather dense and there are other introductions and expositions, some of them very good.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117493#117493Answer by Martin for Old books still usedMartin2012-12-29T09:53:38Z2012-12-29T10:01:04Z<p>How about:</p>
<p>G. H. Hardy, J. E. Littlewood, G. Pólya, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=t1RCSP8YKt8C" rel="nofollow">Inequalities</a> (1934, second edition 1952).</p>
<p>G. Pólya, G. Szegő, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=b9l2NqGEFzgC" rel="nofollow">Problems and Theorems in Analysis</a> (first German edition in 1925)</p>
<p>G. Szegő, <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=3hcW8HBh7gsC" rel="nofollow">Orthogonal Polynomials</a> (1939)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117502#117502Answer by Ian Morris for Old books still usedIan Morris2012-12-29T10:54:26Z2012-12-29T11:00:31Z<p>My own field, ergodic theory, is relatively young in that some concepts now regarded as fundamental -- Kolmogorov-Sinai entropy, for example -- were not fully formulated until around 1960. Nonetheless there are a couple of old books still in use and receiving citations:</p>
<p>E. Hopf, <em>Ergodentheorie</em>, 1937;</p>
<p>R. Halmos, <em>Ergodic theory</em>, 1957.</p>
<p>If the 1960s are sufficiently long ago to constitute "old" then there are many old references in probability which remain in heavy use, for example:</p>
<p>P. Billingsley, <em>Convergence of probability measures</em>, 1968;</p>
<p>L. Breiman, <em>Probability</em>, 1968;</p>
<p>and one of the classics of the field:</p>
<p>W. Feller, <em>Introduction to probability theory and its applications</em>, 1950.</p>
<p>Outside my own field, a much-cited number theory text which no-one has yet mentioned:</p>
<p>A. Khinchin, <em>Continued fractions</em>, 1936.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117504#117504Answer by Chandrasekhar for Old books still usedChandrasekhar2012-12-29T11:10:55Z2012-12-29T11:10:55Z<p>My choice of books would be:</p>
<ul>
<li><p><em>Theory of Riemann-Zeta Function</em> by E.C. Titchmarsh, (Oxford University Press)</p></li>
<li><p><em>Theory of Functions</em> by E.C. Titchmarsh (Oxford University Press, 1952).</p></li>
</ul>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117516#117516Answer by Misha for Old books still usedMisha2012-12-29T14:22:03Z2012-12-29T14:22:03Z<p>Montgomery and Zippin "Topological Transformation Groups" (originally published in 1955) is still the only book to cover the relevant results on topological characterization of Lie groups in full generality (including Lie group actions). I am not sure if this belongs to algebra or topology area-wise, but it is used in my area, geometric group theory. </p>
<p>For pedagogical purposes, I still use "What Is Mathematics?" by Courant and Robbins (originally published in 1941) and "Geometry and Imagination" (1932) by Hilbert and Kohn-Vossen, when a high school student or an undergraduate asks me for suggestions. </p>
<p>My personal definition of an "old book" is the same as Lee Mosher's, so I do not include here Chapters 4-6 of Bourbaki's "Lie groups and Lie algebras" (1968) which I use as a working tool. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117524#117524Answer by jmbr for Old books still usedjmbr2012-12-29T15:13:00Z2012-12-29T15:13:00Z<p><a href="http://store.doverpublications.com/0486601471.html" rel="nofollow">Mathematical Foundations of Statistical Mechanics by A. I. Khinchin</a>. The original edition in Russian was published in 1943 according to MathSciNet (MR Number=(17677)).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117581#117581Answer by Matemáticos Chibchas for Old books still usedMatemáticos Chibchas2012-12-30T02:09:46Z2012-12-30T02:09:46Z<p>The calculus and analysis texts of Michael Spivak and Tom Apostol come to my mind...at least they are still widely used in my land (Colombia) for undergraduate (serious) math courses.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117591#117591Answer by David Corwin for Old books still usedDavid Corwin2012-12-30T05:35:24Z2013-01-02T22:06:45Z<p>Tate's thesis, <em>Fourier analysis in number fields, and Hecke's zeta-functions</em>, is from 1950 and is certainly still considered a primary on the subject (in addition to being the original resource).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117606#117606Answer by lostinfinity for Old books still usedlostinfinity2012-12-30T09:39:05Z2012-12-30T09:39:05Z<p>Cassels and Frohlich (editors) on class field theory is regularly reprinted.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117607#117607Answer by lostinfinity for Old books still usedlostinfinity2012-12-30T09:42:41Z2012-12-30T09:42:41Z<p>Some volumes of Bourbaki, as Topological Vector spaces or Lie groups are still widely quoted.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117610#117610Answer by András Salamon for Old books still usedAndrás Salamon2012-12-30T10:31:50Z2012-12-30T10:31:50Z<p>N. G de Bruijn's <em>Asymptotic methods in analysis</em> is still the best reference for the topic. The current 1981 Dover reprint edition is largely unchanged since the 1958 first edition.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117618#117618Answer by PuyuWang for Old books still usedPuyuWang2012-12-30T12:37:23Z2012-12-30T12:37:23Z<p>Mathematical Analysis By Zorich </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117636#117636Answer by none for Old books still usednone2012-12-30T15:01:08Z2012-12-30T15:01:08Z<p>I was just looking at HSM Coxeter's <i>Regular Polytopes</i> (1948) pretty recently, and it is still wonderful.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117654#117654Answer by njguliyev for Old books still usednjguliyev2012-12-30T17:37:56Z2012-12-30T17:37:56Z<p>"Differential and integral calculus" (Russian) by G. M. Fichtenholz was first published in 1948. Recently (in 2009) its $9^{th}$ edition was published and this book is still used as the main calculus textbook at some universities.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117711#117711Answer by Ostap Chervak for Old books still usedOstap Chervak2012-12-31T10:37:01Z2012-12-31T10:37:01Z<p>R. Engelking (1977). General Topology.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117713#117713Answer by Alexander Shamov for Old books still usedAlexander Shamov2012-12-31T10:59:28Z2012-12-31T10:59:28Z<p>Hardy "Divergent series" (1949)</p>
<p>Naimark "Normed rings" (1968)</p>
<p>Maurin "Methods of Hilbert spaces" (1959)</p>
<p>Hille & Phillips "Functional analysis and semigroups" (1957)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117737#117737Answer by Federico Poloni for Old books still usedFederico Poloni2012-12-31T15:39:39Z2013-04-14T21:21:02Z<p>In numerical linear algebra, Gantmacher's <em>The theory of matrices</em> is still a widely read and cited text (see <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/search/publications.html?refcit=1657129&loc=refcit" rel="nofollow">MathSciNet</a> <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/search/publications.html?refcit=107647%2520107648%2520107649&loc=refcit" rel="nofollow">citations</a>). The Russian original dates back to 1953 (thanks @Giuseppe), and the first English translation is from 1959.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117738#117738Answer by Jonny Evans for Old books still usedJonny Evans2012-12-31T15:52:17Z2012-12-31T15:52:17Z<p>Dickson's "History of the Theory of Numbers" is not only old (1919), but it reviews material which is even older. I found it extremely useful when calculating some family Gromov-Witten invariants in <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1239" rel="nofollow">a recent paper with Jarek Kedra</a> - while performing the arithmetic manipulations in Section 8, we would have been lost without the wealth of formulae in Dickson. I've no doubt the material appears elsewhere, but Dickson has a comprehensive and carefully historical approach.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117817#117817Answer by Fredrik Meyer for Old books still usedFredrik Meyer2013-01-01T23:33:45Z2013-01-01T23:33:45Z<p>"Introduction to commutative algebra" by Atiyah and MacDonald is from 1969. (I learnt commutative algebra from this book at the University of Oslo just a few years ago)</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117850#117850Answer by Mustafa Said for Old books still usedMustafa Said2013-01-02T09:00:52Z2013-01-02T09:00:52Z<p>Barry Simon and Michael Reed's classic volume on Functional Analysis (1981) is my one of my favorites.</p>
<p>Ayoub, "An Introduction to the Analytic Theory of Numbers," (1963) is out of print but one of the best books on the subject.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117859#117859Answer by Zsbán Ambrus for Old books still usedZsbán Ambrus2013-01-02T11:19:54Z2013-04-14T20:37:13Z<p>Most of the textbooks I use are quite new. The old books are the exception.</p>
<p>The oldest book about mathematics I use is Hajós György: <em>Bevezetés a geometriába</em>, a textbook on elementary geometry (in the sense of Euclid). The first edition is from 1950, I have a copy published in 1960. (Edit: it seems there's a German translation.)</p>
<p>I'm also using Knuth's <em>The Art of Computer Programming</em>, does that count as old now? The translation of the first volume is based on the second edition, of which the original was published in 1973.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/117901#117901Answer by Gene Ward Smith for Old books still usedGene Ward Smith2013-01-02T19:53:36Z2013-01-02T19:53:36Z<p>In classical invariant theory, both "The Algebra of Invariants" by Grace and Young and "An introduction to the algebra of quantics" by Elliott are still much in use. The latest edition of Grace and Young is 1903 and of Elliott 1913.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118116#118116Answer by J.J. Green for Old books still usedJ.J. Green2013-01-05T12:24:33Z2013-01-05T12:24:33Z<p>G.N. Watson's "A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions" (1922), </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118253#118253Answer by Dong Wang for Old books still usedDong Wang2013-01-07T08:57:00Z2013-01-07T08:57:00Z<p>No one suggests Weyl's Classical Groups? It was first published in 1939. I don't know if researchers in representation theory and invariant theory value it nowadays, but it is still frequently cited in random matrix literature.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118262#118262Answer by Giuseppe for Old books still usedGiuseppe2013-01-07T10:47:14Z2013-01-07T10:56:01Z<p>Many systematic introductions to the foundations of the edifice of Differential Geometry appeared in the sixties, and they are useful references even today. Some of them are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Lang, Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds, 1962;</li>
<li>Helgason, Differential Geometry and Symmetric Spaces, 1962;</li>
<li>Kobayashi, Nomizu, Foundations of Differential Geometry, 1st Vol 1963, 2nd Vol 1969;</li>
<li>Sternberg, Lectures on Differential Geometry, 1964;</li>
<li>Bishop, Crittenden, Geometry of Manifolds, 1964;</li>
</ul>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118492#118492Answer by ex0du5 for Old books still usedex0du52013-01-10T01:40:43Z2013-01-10T01:40:43Z<p>I still think the exposition on elliptic functions in Jacobi's <em>Fundamenta Nova</em> (1829) is one of the best I've encountered if you are interested in the functional relationships. A close second for me is Cayley's <em>An elementary treatise on elliptic functions</em> (1895), especially for the number of alternative proofs presented and the numerous relationships detailed. Modern books tend to take the algebraic approach, which is obviously extremely important for understanding the true nature of the relationships here, but for those of us who study the field because of it's incidental use in combinatorics and generating functions, these older books are a wealth.</p>
<p>Also, I have a personal love of Gauss' <em>Disquisitiones Arithmeticae</em> (1798) because it introduced me to number theory at a young age in a way that was very natural and elegant. Again, I appreciated it's approach to forms and related because it was all easily understandable with middle school algebra.</p>
<p>And finally more modern, for me Goldblatt's <em>Topoi: The categorial analysis of logic</em> (1979) is the best introduction to categories one could have, far better in my opinion than even Mac Lane's. That it is also subversive propaganda for constructivism is also a huge bonus.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118495#118495Answer by Ben Crowell for Old books still usedBen Crowell2013-01-10T01:59:09Z2013-01-10T02:11:32Z<p>Keisler's "Calculus: An Approach Using Infinitesimals" is a very cool freshman calc book using NSA. It dates back to 1976, and is available for free online: <a href="http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html</a> . Although I'm not aware of anyone who's using Keisler in the classroom today, it's under a Creative Commons license, and there is a newer book by Guichard and Koblitz that incorporates a bunch of material from Keisler: <a href="http://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/multivariable/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whitman.edu/mathematics/multivariable/</a> . In the world of the digital commons, it's a little hard to define how old a book is. It's like asking how old a bacterium is. Bacteria are in some sense immortal. They just evolve.</p>
<p>Another wonderful old calc book that is still in print is Calculus Made Easy, by Silvanus Thompson, 1910.</p>
<p>I noticed that another answer to this question got heavily downvoted for referring to a book published in the 1980's. The question was: 'What are the oldest books regularly used in your field (and which don't feel "outdated")?' It didn't specify what "used" meant -- used in research, teaching, personal study, ...? The lower you get on the educational totem pole, the shorter the half-life of a book. Someone posted that they liked Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, but that doesn't mean it's being used for teaching number theory to undergrad math majors. For freshman calc, it is extremely unusual for anybody to use anything more than 5 years old. The community college where I teach has an explicit rule forbidding the use of books of more than about that age.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118501#118501Answer by George Melvin for Old books still usedGeorge Melvin2013-01-10T05:01:03Z2013-01-10T05:01:03Z<p>My first thought was Atiyah & Macdonald's 'An Introduction to Commutative Algebra' - which has already been mentioned - and 'anything by J.P. Serre' (that's old enough, of course!). It appears that not quite everything in this latter category has been mentioned; notably, 'Algebres de Lie Semi-simple Complexes', first published in 1966. There is also a later English translation, 'Complex Semisimple Lie Algebras' published in 1987. </p>
<p>While not quite an introduction, I find myself referring back to this text often for its streamlined, beautiful exposition (a hallmark of Serre). It also has the best exposition of root systems I've encountered. </p>
<p>Furthermore, another classic text on semisimple Lie algebras (J. Humphreys - 'Introduction to Lie Algebras & Representation Theory') is a 'fleshing out' of Serre's notes. Actually, Humphreys's textbook was first published in 1972 so might squeeze onto this list too?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/118577#118577Answer by Yazdegerd III for Old books still usedYazdegerd III2013-01-10T21:54:05Z2013-01-10T21:54:05Z<p>Emil Artin's Geometric Algebra (Interscience, 1957) is definitely immortal.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/120985#120985Answer by Scott Guthery for Old books still usedScott Guthery2013-02-06T16:24:02Z2013-02-06T16:24:02Z<p>Nathaniel Bowditch is generally regarded as a nineteenth century American mathematician . His American Practical Navigator has been in continous print since 1804. It is still in use today judging from the comments on Amazon. But perhaps this isn't what was meant by a mathematics book and perhaps navigation isn't to be considered applied mathematics.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/127558#127558Answer by Reeve for Old books still usedReeve2013-04-14T21:45:14Z2013-04-14T21:45:14Z<p>My field is dominated by older books, it seems. Gilmer's <em>Multiplicative Ideal Theory</em> came out in 1972 and it's nearly unmatched in the content it covers. We're currently using Kaplansky's <em>Commutative Rings</em> book for the Commutative Algebra course I'm taking at UCR; Atiyah and Macdonald's book is also considered a standard reference for those kinds of courses, and it came out in 1969. And, of course, you can't forget Bourbaki. I'm also partial to Zariski and Samuel's <em>Commutative Algebra</em> texts over other texts in the field, which came out in 1958 and 1961.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/127570#127570Answer by Dick Palais for Old books still usedDick Palais2013-04-15T02:06:26Z2013-04-15T02:06:26Z<p>Spivak's five volume "Comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry" still gets a lot of use---particularly the first two volumes.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/127577#127577Answer by Charlie Frohman for Old books still usedCharlie Frohman2013-04-15T04:00:08Z2013-04-15T04:00:08Z<p>Rudin's Principles of Mathematical
Analysis, and Herstein's Topics in
Algebra if not heavily used, are the
ideal that many people strive to in
teaching introductory analysis and abstract
algebra to undergraduates.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/128161#128161Answer by Henr.L for Old books still usedHenr.L2013-04-20T10:30:17Z2013-04-20T10:30:17Z<p>I would like to mention about M. Postnikov's geometry series, <em>Lectures on geometry</em> which I always refer to when I need some coherent view inbetween geometry and analysis. </p>
<p>Sometimes I may refer to Hopf and Alexanderoff's <em>Topologie</em> in order to gain some authority...</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/128165#128165Answer by S. Carnahan for Old books still usedS. Carnahan2013-04-20T11:38:34Z2013-04-20T11:38:34Z<p>When I was an undergrad, at the turn of the millenium, I took a complex analysis class that used (an English translation of) Knopp's 1936 <em>Funktionentheorie</em>.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/117415/old-books-still-used/128206#128206Answer by unknown (google) for Old books still usedunknown (google)2013-04-21T02:11:21Z2013-04-21T02:11:21Z<p>Probability Theory, by Feller. Volumes I and II. Oldies but goldies</p>