Reference for "almost all graphs have diameter 2" - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T23:26:50Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/115276http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/115276/reference-for-almost-all-graphs-have-diameter-2Reference for "almost all graphs have diameter 2"Felix Goldberg2012-12-03T11:42:15Z2012-12-03T14:10:03Z
<p>The property in the title is well-known. I am trying to find an original reference to its first appearance in print. The 4th edition of <em>Graphs & Digraphs</em> by Chartrand and Lesniak lists this as Theorem 13.6 and says that it's a generalization of a result by Gilbert, but gives no further reference. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/115276/reference-for-almost-all-graphs-have-diameter-2/115292#115292Answer by Andreas Blass for Reference for "almost all graphs have diameter 2"Andreas Blass2012-12-03T13:48:45Z2012-12-03T13:55:08Z<p>The result you asked about follows instantly from Fagin's proof of the zero-one law for finite graphs. He shows that all of Gaifman's extension axioms have asymptotic probability 1, and "diameter $\leq 2$" is essentially one of the extension axioms. Fagin's paper is "Probabilities on finite models" [J. Symbolic Logic 41 (1976) pp.50-58]. I believe the zero-one law was proved earlier by four Russians, but I don't have access to their paper and don't know whether their method immediately implies the "diameter $\leq2$" result.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/115276/reference-for-almost-all-graphs-have-diameter-2/115296#115296Answer by Brendan McKay for Reference for "almost all graphs have diameter 2"Brendan McKay2012-12-03T14:00:40Z2012-12-03T14:10:03Z<p>I think you will find it in Moon, J. W.; Moser, L.
Almost all (0,1) matrices are primitive.
Studia Sci. Math. Hungar. 1 (1966) 153–156.
But I don't have time to visit the library to be sure and I don't see it online.</p>
<p>It is certainly in
Burtin, Ju. D.
Asymptotic estimates of the diameter and the independence and domination numbers of a random graph. (Russian)
Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 209 (1973), 765–768.</p>
<p>I guess the Gilbert mentioned is Gilbert, E. N.
Random graphs.
Ann. Math. Statist. 30 (1959) 1141–1144. It isn't clear exactly why... </p>