Divergence form Elliptic PDE Removable Singularity/Regularity Question - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-25T22:53:01Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/114531http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/114531/divergence-form-elliptic-pde-removable-singularity-regularity-questionDivergence form Elliptic PDE Removable Singularity/Regularity QuestionSpencer2012-11-26T14:47:55Z2012-11-28T14:33:24Z
<p><strong>Idea</strong></p>
<p>Given a $W^{1,2}$ solution to a linear divergence form uniformly elliptic pde with bounded coefficients, standard De Giorgi-Nash-Moser theory tells us that the solution is infact (Holder) continuous. If you have better regularity away from one isolated point, say you are $C^1$ on the puncutered ball, can the solution still fail to be differentiable at that isolated point?</p>
<p>The situations I am most familiar with tend to be ones in which one can go from boundedness and continuity to smoothness via Schauder theory and bootstrapping. Here, we already have continuity: But can differentiability fail at a single point? TIt seems out of reach of all the theorems I've seen, which makes me suspect it is false, but I cannot be sure without a counterexample. Does anyone have any ideas?</p>
<p><strong>Details</strong></p>
<p>In the specific situation I am interested in, I know a bit more. I am considering the following:</p>
<p>$u \in W^{1,\infty}(B_1(0)) \cap C^{1,1}_{loc}(B_1(0)\setminus ${0}$)$ satisfies weakly the equation</p>
<p>$D_i(A_{ij}(x)D_ju) = D_ig^i$ </p>
<p>in $B_1(0)$, where $A_{ij},g^i \in L^{\infty}(B_1(0))\cap W^{1,2}_{loc}(B_1(0)\setminus ${0}$)$. </p>
<p><strong>Questions</strong></p>
<p>1) Must $u$ in fact be a $C^1$ solution on $B_1(0)$? </p>
<p>2) What about just being differentiable at 0? </p>
<p>3) How about even just $u \in W^{2,p}(B_1(0))$ for some $p > 1$?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/114531/divergence-form-elliptic-pde-removable-singularity-regularity-question/114767#114767Answer by Daniel Spector for Divergence form Elliptic PDE Removable Singularity/Regularity QuestionDaniel Spector2012-11-28T12:31:37Z2012-11-28T12:41:07Z<p>I believe the following is a counterexample:</p>
<p>Let $N=1$, $B_1(0)=(-1,1)$, $u(x)=|x|$, then $|u^\prime(x)| = 1$, $u^{\prime \prime}(x) = 2\delta_0$, </p>
<p>and </p>
<p>$u^\prime(x) = 2H(x)-1$,</p>
<p>where $H$ is the Heaviside function, $H \in L^\infty \cap W^{1,2}_{loc}((-1,1)\setminus {0})$.</p>
<p>Thus $u$ solves $(\frac{1}{2} u^\prime)^\prime = H^\prime$,</p>
<p>which is the PDE in one dimension, with $H$ in the right space, $u$ is smooth away from the origin and $u \in W^{1,\infty}(-1,1)$, but $u^{\prime\prime}$ is only a measure and so not in $L^p(-1,1)$ for any $p>1$.</p>
<p>In particular, $u$ is not $C^1$, $u$ is not smooth at the origin, and $u^{\prime\prime} \notin L^p(-1,1)$.</p>
<p>More generally, the computation extends into more dimensions, as far as I can tell.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/114531/divergence-form-elliptic-pde-removable-singularity-regularity-question/114771#114771Answer by Denis Serre for Divergence form Elliptic PDE Removable Singularity/Regularity QuestionDenis Serre2012-11-28T13:25:16Z2012-11-28T13:25:16Z<p>The theory of removable singularities began with Laurent Véron. It was continued by H. Brézis and others. </p>
<p>When the elliptic equation is linear, the important ingredient is the codimension of the subset where you are lacking information. Codimension one is too big (see the counter-example in Dan Spector' answer). Usually, codimension 2 is OK, because then the subset has zero capacity.</p>
<p>When the equation is non-linear, for instance $\Delta u+|u|^{p-1}u=0$, the situation depends upon the exponent $p>1$ and the integrability that you <em>a priori</em> know about $\nabla u$ or $u$. Say that the equation is posed the punctured ball. It admits a radial solution
$$u=\omega r^{-\alpha},\qquad \alpha=\frac2{p-1},\qquad\omega=(\alpha(\alpha+2-d))^{\frac1{p-1}}.$$
If you know (or assume) for instance that $u\in W^{1,2}$, then $\alpha<\frac d2-1$, that is $\frac2{p-1}<\frac d2-1$. In other words, if $p\le\frac{d+2}{d-2}$, then the singularity at origin is removable.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/114531/divergence-form-elliptic-pde-removable-singularity-regularity-question/114774#114774Answer by Deane Yang for Divergence form Elliptic PDE Removable Singularity/Regularity QuestionDeane Yang2012-11-28T14:33:24Z2012-11-28T14:33:24Z<p>With a linear elliptic PDE, there's no way to bootstrap. What you see is what you get. The regularity of $A^{ij}\partial_j u$ cannot be made any better than the regularity of $g^i$. So if all you assume about $g^i$ is that it is $L^\infty$, then that's all you get for $A^{ij}\partial_j u$. Once this observation is made, it's easy to find the simplest possible example (where $u$ is Lipschitz, $\partial u$ is $L^\infty$, and you just set $A^{ij} = \delta^{ij}$ and $g^i = \partial_iu$). And that's exactly the one found by Daniel, which works in all dimensions.</p>