For consecutive primes $a\lt b\lt c$, prove that $a+b\ge c$. - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-24T06:33:16Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/113840http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/113840/for-consecutive-primes-a-lt-b-lt-c-prove-that-ab-ge-cFor consecutive primes $a\lt b\lt c$, prove that $a+b\ge c$.Bavid2012-11-19T16:12:47Z2013-02-10T00:54:54Z
<p>For consecutive primes $a\lt b\lt c$, prove that $a+b\ge c$.</p>
<p>I cannot find a counter-example to this. Do we know if this inequality is true? Alternatively, is this some documented problem (solved or unsolved)? </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/113840/for-consecutive-primes-a-lt-b-lt-c-prove-that-ab-ge-c/113843#113843Answer by Tony Huynh for For consecutive primes $a\lt b\lt c$, prove that $a+b\ge c$.Tony Huynh2012-11-19T16:27:01Z2012-11-19T16:27:01Z<p>Yes, this is true. In 1952, Nagura proved that for $n \geq 25$, there is always a prime between $n$ and $(6/5)n$. Thus, let $p_k$ be a prime at least 25. Then $p_k+p_{k+1} > 2p_k$. But by Nagura's result we have that $p_{k+2} \leq 36/25 p_k < 2p_k$. It is easy to verify the conjecture for small values of $p$. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/113840/for-consecutive-primes-a-lt-b-lt-c-prove-that-ab-ge-c/113882#113882Answer by quid for For consecutive primes $a\lt b\lt c$, prove that $a+b\ge c$.quid2012-11-19T23:52:26Z2012-11-19T23:52:26Z<p><a href="http://www.imsc.res.in/~rao/ramanujan/CamUnivCpapers/Cpaper24/page2.htm" rel="nofollow">Ramanujan (1919), see Eq. (18):</a> </p>
<blockquote>
<p>$$\pi(x) - \pi(x/2) \ge 2 \quad \text{ for } x\ge 11 $$</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Whence, with $x= 2p_k$ for $p_k \ge 7$, $$p_{k+2} \le 2 p_k \lt p_k+p_{k+1}, $$ and $5\le 2+3$, $7\le 3+ 5$, $11 \le 5+7$. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/113840/for-consecutive-primes-a-lt-b-lt-c-prove-that-ab-ge-c/113885#113885Answer by J. H. S. for For consecutive primes $a\lt b\lt c$, prove that $a+b\ge c$.J. H. S.2012-11-20T00:40:51Z2012-11-20T01:07:24Z<p>As a matter of fact, P. L. Chebyshev knew already that for any $\epsilon > \frac{1}{5}$, there exists an $n(\epsilon) \in \mathbb{N}$ such that for all $n\geq n(\epsilon),$ </p>
<p>$\pi((1+\epsilon)n)-\pi(n)>0.$</p>
<p>In [2], one can find a short report on the problem of determining the smallest $n(\epsilon)$ explicitly once that $\epsilon$ has been fixed.</p>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<p>[1] P. L. Chebyshev. <em>Mémoire sur les nombres premiers</em>. Mémoires de l'Acad. Imp. Sci. de St. Pétersbourg, VII, 1850.</p>
<p>[2] H. Harborth & A. Kemnitz. <em>Calculations for Bertrand's Postulate</em>. Mathematics Magazine, <strong>54</strong> (1), pp. 33-34.</p>