most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-23T18:04:57Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/112015 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/112015/the-history-of-the-geometrization-of-closed-surfaces Jonah Sinick 2012-11-10T19:38:47Z 2012-11-11T14:25:06Z

<ol> <li><p>Who first recognized that the torus supports a flat structure? </p></li> <li><p>Who first characterized the moduli space of flat structures on the torus?</p></li> <li><p>Who first recognized that the closed, orientable genus 2 supports a hyperbolic structure?</p></li> <li><p>Who first thought of a geometrized surface in terms of the property that for any two points $A$ and $B$ there exists an isometry of the surface that takes $A$ to $B$?</p></li> </ol> <p>[Reposted <a href="http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/234034/who-first-discovered-that-the-torus-supports-a-flat-structure" rel="nofollow">from Math Stack Exchange</a>.]</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/112015/the-history-of-the-geometrization-of-closed-surfaces/112020#112020 Alexandre Eremenko 2012-11-10T20:52:07Z 2012-11-11T14:25:06Z

<p>I believe that on the first two questions, there is no answer (so they are not well-posed:-) The reason is that the flat structure on a torus and the moduli spaces of tori where very well understood long before the notions of "flat", "structure", "moduli space" and even "tori" were introduced. Mathematicians just did not think in these terms. Once these notions were introduced, the tori became a simple example.</p> <p>Teichmuller was probably a person who made the notion of "moduli space" completely rigorous, though it was considered for the first time by Riemann. And Teichmuller considers tori at a great length to explain what he means. But certainly he did not find anything new about tori. This was just the simplest example. (Many people think, perhaps correctly, that Abel and Jacobi already knew everyhting about tori, though they did not use this word). Modular group was known to Gauss at about the same time. It is true, these things were developed for another 70 years or so, culminating in the Fricke-Klein and enormous French "treateases". But I know people who still prefer Jacobi's exposition, and even study Latin to read it:-) </p> <p>The metric of constant negative curvature on surfaces of genus >1 is another story. This was introduced by Poincare. Even the Poincare metric on the unit disc was apparently Poincare's invention.<br> (Schwarz lemma was stated and proved much later, and not by Schwarz:-)</p> <p>About the last question, I suppose Klein has to be credited. It was Klein who in his "Erlangen program" explained explicitly "what geometry is", and how it is connected with a group action of certain kind. Klein was in close collaboration with Lee at that time.</p> <p>There is an excellent "primary source" on how all these things really developed: Klein's Lectures on the history of Math in XIX century.</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/112015/the-history-of-the-geometrization-of-closed-surfaces/112025#112025 Igor Rivin 2012-11-10T21:10:53Z 2012-11-10T21:10:53Z

<p>See <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniformization_theorem" rel="nofollow">this Wikipedia article,</a> and the references therein. Jeremy Gray's article is particularly enlightening.</p>