On some finiteness properties for schemes - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T05:28:46Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/111685http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/111685/on-some-finiteness-properties-for-schemesOn some finiteness properties for schemesAnonymous2012-11-06T21:36:54Z2012-11-08T16:59:05Z
<p>Consider the following properties of scheme $X$:</p>
<p>A: $X$ is of finite type over $\mathbb{Z}$</p>
<p>B: $X$ is Noetherian</p>
<p>C: $X$ is of finite Krull dimension</p>
<p>What implications are there between these three? I believe that B and C are independent of each other (although I can't find a reference right now), and it follows from EGA I, 6.3.7 that A implies B. But does A imply C?</p>
<p>(Apologies if this question is "trivial", but I'm not an expert in algebraic geometry.)</p>
<p>As an aside, I would also be interested if any of these properties can be related to some notion of cohomological dimension (not sure what kind of topologies would be relevant for this).</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/111685/on-some-finiteness-properties-for-schemes/111704#111704Answer by Piotr Achinger for On some finiteness properties for schemesPiotr Achinger2012-11-07T05:43:05Z2012-11-08T16:59:05Z<p><strong>A implies B.</strong> True, as you said, because a finitely generated ring is Noetherian, and $X$ is glued from finitely many spectra of such.</p>
<p><strong>A implies C.</strong> True (argument as above).</p>
<p><strong>B implies A.</strong> False, e.g. $X = \mathrm{Spec }\ \mathbb{Q}$.</p>
<p><strong>B implies C.</strong> False (I believe). There are rings $R$ whose spectrum is homeomorphic to the topological space $\{1, 2, \ldots \}$ with open sets $\{n, n+1, \ldots\}$, which is Noetherian but of infinite Krull dimension. I think something like $\mathrm{Spec }\ k[x_1, x_1 x_2, x_1 x_2 x_3, \ldots]$ should work, but I didn't check the details. <strong>EDIT.</strong> This is nonsense - see the comments below and Fred Rohrer's answer.</p>
<p><strong>C implies A.</strong> False, e.g. $X= \mathrm{Spec }\ \mathbb{Q}$.</p>
<p><strong>C implies B.</strong> False, e.g. $X = \mathrm{Spec}\ k[x, x^{1/2}, x^{1/3}, \ldots]$. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/111685/on-some-finiteness-properties-for-schemes/111709#111709Answer by Fred Rohrer for On some finiteness properties for schemesFred Rohrer2012-11-07T07:15:42Z2012-11-08T08:16:19Z<p>An example of a noetherian ring of infinite dimension can be found in Nagata's <em>Local Rings</em>, Appendix A1, Example 1.</p>
<p><strong>Edit:</strong> An interesting generalisation of Nagata's construction yielding noetherian rings of infinite dimension whose maximal ideals have prescribed heights was given by Fujita in his article <a href="http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=euclid.hmj/1206136627" rel="nofollow"><em>Infinite dimensional Noetherian Hilbert domains</em></a>, Hiroshima Math. J. 5 (1975), 181–185. </p>