monge-ampere operator - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-20T02:17:14Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/110633http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/110633/monge-ampere-operatormonge-ampere operatordigital2012-10-25T08:40:34Z2013-05-11T01:22:00Z
<p>hello everybody,
i'm studying the article of Bedford-Taylor "Fine topology silov boundary..." but i don't
understand the proof of the following proposition.</p>
<p>Let u,v plurisubharmonic function defined on $\Omega$ open subset of $\mathbb{C}^n$ such that
$u,v\in L^{\infty}_{loc}(\Omega)$. </p>
<p>Let $O$ be a fine-open subset of $\Omega$ where $u>v$.
Then
$(dd^{c}\max(u,v))^{n}|O=(dd^{n}u)^{n}|O$.</p>
<p>They say that if $O$ is open then it is obvious. while if $O$ is just fine open then using a decreasing approximation sequence $u_k$ of smooth functions for $u$.</p>
<p>Then
since $O=\bigcap_{k}(u_k>v)$ and since $(dd^{c}\max(u_k,v))^{n}|O_k=(dd^{n}u_k)^{n}|O_k$ (this dont'understand),</p>
<p>where $O_k=(u_k>v)$, the statement holds.</p>
<p>Maybe it is trivial but i'm not able to see it.
thanks </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/110633/monge-ampere-operator/110736#110736Answer by digital for monge-ampere operatordigital2012-10-26T08:13:19Z2012-10-26T08:50:09Z<p>yes i see it, but even on $O$ $u=\max(u,v)$ so i don't understand why he passes to an approximation sequence. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/110633/monge-ampere-operator/110765#110765Answer by bonho for monge-ampere operatorbonho2012-10-26T16:15:39Z2012-10-26T16:15:39Z<p>Hi digital: I can not give comments, hence give answer here for your answer. If O is not open, then u=max(u,v) on O does not neccessarily imply that dd^cu=dd^cmax (u,v) on a neighborhood of O, so that when restricting to O you get the equality. (If you want to do derivatives, you need to do it on an open set).</p>