Normal Family for several complex variable (from $C^{n} $to$ C^{n}\U$) - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-19T17:10:22Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/109437http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/109437/normal-family-for-several-complex-variable-from-cn-to-cn-uNormal Family for several complex variable (from $C^{n} $to$ C^{n}\U$)yaoxiao2012-10-12T06:44:38Z2012-10-12T22:27:11Z
<p>Recently I face up with a problem, which I realized that have close connection with the following problem.
${ f_{n} }_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is analytic map from $C^{n}$ to $C^{n} $\ $U$ where U is open neighborhood of 0, whether f is a normal family. </p>
<p>I know when n=1, this is really Montel Normal family criterion, However I did know whether it is true for high dimension. also I heard that the for any two topological equivalent simple connected domain in$ C^{n}$ $(n\geq 2)$, the probability of holomorphic equivalent for this two domain is 0. I want to know what is the precise statement for this theorem.</p>
<p>Any advice and comments will be appreciated.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/109437/normal-family-for-several-complex-variable-from-cn-to-cn-u/109497#109497Answer by Margaret Friedland for Normal Family for several complex variable (from $C^{n} $to$ C^{n}\U$)Margaret Friedland2012-10-12T22:27:11Z2012-10-12T22:27:11Z<p>The key phrase to keep in mind is "taut manifold":
a complex manifold X which is taut has the property that Hol(Y,X) is normal for every complex
manifold Y. A fact that may be of interest to you is that a taut domain in $\mathbb{C}^n$ is necessarily pseudoconvex.</p>
<p>More information, including criteria of tautness and the relation with the notion of hyperbolicity can be found in the following books: by Marco Abate,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dm.unipi.it/~abate/libri/libriric/files/IterationThTautMan2-1.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.dm.unipi.it/~abate/libri/libriric/files/IterationThTautMan2-1.pdf</a></p>
<p>and by Shoshichi Kobayashi,</p>
<p>Hyperbolic Complex Spaces, Springer, 1998</p>
<p>As for lack of biholomorphic equivalence for domains in $\mathbb{C}^n$, I am not sure if your "probabilistic" statement can be put on rigorous footing. It is true that an euclidean ball and a polydisk in $\mathbb{C}^n$ are not biholomorphically equivalent when $n \geq 2$. The result goes back to Poincare and has several proofs. You can learn more from the text by S. Krantz in several comlex variables; there is also a good sketch of proof among the exercises in the text by Grauert and Fritzsche, "From holomorphic functions to complex manifolds." </p>