most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net 2013-05-25T09:10:07Z http://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/107872 http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdf http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107872/when-can-you-describe-a-population-and-its-component-subpopulations-with-the-same andrewH 2012-09-23T00:54:34Z 2013-05-24T18:22:00Z

<p>I believe that it is often the case that you are trying to select the best probability distribution to use to describe some phenomenon you are studying, and you have data not only for a population, but for sub-populations of that population. I am trying to better understand the constraints that you place on your choice of distribution if you want to (correctly) use the same parametric family of distributions for the sub-populations as for the population as a whole. My interest is primarily in the distribution of income, wealth, and consumption, e.g. comparing state-level distributions to one another, to regional distributions, and to the national distribution. But I believe the problem to be common to many problems and disciplines.</p> <p>Suppose that, for all X and Y such that both are populations drawn from the a specified parametric family of distributions f(θ), where one or more selected elements of θ differ between the two, a merged super-population Z is also a member of the parametric family f for some value of θ. A trivial example would be two uniform distributions defined over the same interval.</p> <p>I am looking for all the examples I can find of distributions that have this property. Anybody know of any? Does anyone know if this property, closure of a parametric family under merger of populations, has a standard or conventional name? </p> <p>Also, if there is any literature on this property and the distributions that posses it, I would be very grateful for pointers to it.</p> <p>Note that I am not excluding examples where certain elements of θ must be fixed for the property to hold. </p> <p>I am looking for all the examples I can find, but for my application I am especially interested in continuous distributions over the positive real line.</p> <p>Any examples, theory, or citations anyone could offer would be most appreciated. </p> <p>Warmest regards, Andrew</p>

http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107872/when-can-you-describe-a-population-and-its-component-subpopulations-with-the-same/107882#107882 an12 2012-09-23T05:30:42Z 2012-09-23T09:08:16Z

<p>There are so many possible answers and the subject is so large! <p>When the parametric family of distributions is some exponential family, there is this recent and very elegant paper:</p> <ul> <li><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.3054" rel="nofollow">Consistency under Sampling of Exponential Random Graph Models</a></li> </ul> <p>Although it is focused on studying exponential random graph models, which are commonly used in modeling social networks (and other network models), the framework is quite general.</p> <p><strong>Edit 1:</strong> If the question is about which parametric families are closed under taking mixtures, then the following references are relevant</p> <ul> <li><a href="http://webmail.impan.gov.pl/cgi-bin/sm/pdf?sm167-3-01" rel="nofollow">Misiewicz et. al. (2005). Classes of measures closed under mixing and convolution. Weak stability</a></li> <li><a href="http://projecteuclid.org/DPubS?service=UI&amp;version=1.0&amp;verb=Display&amp;handle=euclid.aoms/1177705987" rel="nofollow">Teicher (1960). On the Mixture of Distributions</a></li> </ul>