A Chess Question Of The Late Great W.T.Tutte - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-18T13:51:38Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/107385http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/107385/a-chess-question-of-the-late-great-w-t-tutteA Chess Question Of The Late Great W.T.TutteIan Calvert2012-09-17T14:30:04Z2012-09-17T18:28:52Z
<p>In "Graph Theory As I Have Known It", p.12, Knights Errant, Tutte mentions as an aside the chess question " does either Black or White have a certain win from the initial position, given perfect play by both sides".</p>
<p>Is there any literature on that possibility of a Black win, that is the possibility of the initial chess position being mutual zugzwang? What is the earliest reference to the question?</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107385/a-chess-question-of-the-late-great-w-t-tutte/107399#107399Answer by Carlo Beenakker for A Chess Question Of The Late Great W.T.TutteCarlo Beenakker2012-09-17T15:45:23Z2012-09-17T18:28:52Z<p>The question "does either Black or White have a certain win from the initial position, given perfect play by both sides" was first addressed by Wilhelm Steinitz in his 1896 "Theory of Perfect Play" (Chapter 6 of <A HREF="http://www.archive.org/details/modernchessinstr00steirich" rel="nofollow">Modern Chess Instructor</A>). He concluded that "by proper play on both sides the legitimate issue of a game ought to be a draw".</p>
<p>You can find a quite detailed overview of the literature since Steinitz in <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First-move_advantage_in_chess" rel="nofollow">Wikipedia</A>. The advantages of Black over White seem to be largely psychological ("underdog").</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/107385/a-chess-question-of-the-late-great-w-t-tutte/107401#107401Answer by Ben for A Chess Question Of The Late Great W.T.TutteBen2012-09-17T16:34:04Z2012-09-17T16:34:04Z<p>In my decade of chess-playing, I have never come across anything remotely resembling an answer to this question. If the perfect play question had already been answered by example, chess would be an exercise in memorization -- the absolute perfect path(s) of the game could all be played out down to the endgame, and whoever deviates first loses material. In the event that one side has a forced win, the other side would always be the one forced to lose material. Brute-forcing a solution to chess is nowhere near possible at the moment, given the amount of possible game positions (~ $10^{43}$, according to Claude Shannon). I've never heard of any sound way to argue this question other than brute-force.</p>