Definition of infinite permutations - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2010-03-18T00:42:22Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/1072http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/1072/definition-of-infinite-permutationsDefinition of infinite permutationsHenning Arnór Úlfarsson2009-10-18T20:52:25Z2010-03-14T15:41:25Z
<p>I've been trying to find a definition of an <em>infinite permutation</em> on-line without much success. Does there exist a canonical definition or are there various ways one might go about defining this?</p>
<p>The obvious candidate I guess would be a bijection p : {1,2,...} -> {1,2,...} between the natural numbers. One might also try to use the Robinson-Schensted correspondence between permutations of length n and pairs of standard Young tableaux of size n. Then one would need a definition of infinite Young tableaux.</p>
<p>Another correspondence that might be used is between permutations and permutation matrices.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1072/definition-of-infinite-permutations/1073#1073Answer by Qiaochu Yuan for Definition of infinite permutationsQiaochu Yuan2009-10-18T20:58:45Z2009-10-18T21:11:08Z<p>The bijection definition is fine, although it's not a very nice group. One might also consider the group generated by all transpositions on {1, 2, ...}, which is the subgroup of all bijections that fix all but finitely many elements, and this group is likely to be much nicer; it's countable, for one thing.</p>
<p>Edit: I guess it's worth noting that as far as I can tell the term <a href="http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=infinite+symmetric+group&hl=en&btnG=Search" rel="nofollow">infinite symmetric group</a> is used by mathematicians to refer to the subgroup I described. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1072/definition-of-infinite-permutations/1074#1074Answer by Justin for Definition of infinite permutationsJustin2009-10-18T20:59:58Z2009-10-18T20:59:58Z<p>A permutation on a set A (which need not be countable) is just a bijective map A -> A.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1072/definition-of-infinite-permutations/18049#18049Answer by Igor Pak for Definition of infinite permutationsIgor Pak2010-03-13T09:08:00Z2010-03-13T09:08:00Z<p>There are two closely related definitions which satisfy the properties you want. </p>
<p>First, consider group $\Sigma_k$ the bijections $\pi: \Bbb Z \to \Bbb Z$ such that $\pi(x+k) = \pi(x)+k$ for all $x$. Note that $S_k$ is a subgroup in $\Sigma_k$ - simply take any permutation of ${1,\ldots,k}$ and extend it periodically to all $x$. This group (introduced by Lusztig) is finitely generated and is closely related to affine Lie algebra $\widehat A_k$. The RSK does not exactly work here, but Lusztig does study the shape of Young diagrams (of what would be resulting two tableaux). The shape is a partition of $k$, and can be described using decreasing subsequences, extending Curtis Green's theorem (I forgot if this is in Lusztig's paper or my own easy observation). </p>
<p>Second, a somewhat related definition is the group $\Phi_k$ of bijections $\pi: \Bbb N \to \Bbb N$ such that $\pi(x+k) = \pi(x)+k$ for all $x$ large enough. I studied this definition in <a href="http://www.math.ucla.edu/~pak/papers/inf2.pdf" rel="nofollow">this paper</a>. This group $\Phi_k$ is also finitely generated. It is very suitable for RSK, which is not always, but sometimes invertible. The asymptotic shape I defined is essentially the same as Lusztig's. Neither I nor anyone else studied the infinite matrix extension. The infinite permutation version is already difficult enough. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/1072/definition-of-infinite-permutations/18172#18172Answer by Amy Glen for Definition of infinite permutationsAmy Glen2010-03-14T15:41:25Z2010-03-14T15:41:25Z<p><a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejc.2007.04.017" rel="nofollow">Fon-Der-Flaass and Frid</a> have recently introduced and studied <em>infinite permutations</em> as linear orderings of countable sets with respect to a given "natural" linear ordering. That is, given a countable set X (usually ℕ or ℤ), an infinite permutation π of X is a linear ordering ≤<sub>π</sub> of X that may differ from the "natural" linear ordering of X. If we take X to be finite, then this definition coincides with usual definition of a <em>finite permutation</em> as a bijective map from X to itself.</p>