Bruhat decomposition of a quadric hypersurface - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T21:33:23Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/106460http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/106460/bruhat-decomposition-of-a-quadric-hypersurfaceBruhat decomposition of a quadric hypersurfaceChristopher Perez2012-09-05T21:54:51Z2012-09-06T14:28:29Z
<p>On page 3 of <a href="http://www.imsc.res.in/~kapil/papers/topol.pdf" rel="nofollow">this paper</a>, the authors give a Bruhat cell decomposition of a quadric hypersurface $Q$ of complex dimension $n$. This may be a stupid question, but it doesn't seem clear to me what exactly the decomposition is. They only explicitly describe the real dimension $2n-2$, $n$, and $n+2$ cells, but say that there is exactly one cell for each even real dimension. Particularly, I would like to know what the complex codimension 2 cells are.</p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/106460/bruhat-decomposition-of-a-quadric-hypersurface/106495#106495Answer by David Speyer for Bruhat decomposition of a quadric hypersurfaceDavid Speyer2012-09-06T10:43:54Z2012-09-06T13:29:15Z<p>Let $Q$ live in $\mathbb{P}^{2n-1}$, so $Q$ defines a symmetric bilinear form on $\mathbb{C}^{2n}$, and the complex dimension of $Q$ is $2n-2$. Take a flag of isotropic subspaces $0 \subset F_1 \subset F_2 \subset \cdots \subset F_n$. So $\mathbb{P}(F_i) \subset Q$. For $1 \leq i \leq n-1$, the class of $\mathbb{P}(F_i)$ spans $H_{2i-2}(Q)$ or, Poincare dually, spans $H^{4n-2i-2}(Q)$.</p>
<p>Let $F_i^{\perp}$ denote the $Q$-orthogonal to $F_i$. So $F_n=F_n^{\perp} \subset F_{n-1}^{\perp} \subset \cdots \subset F_2^{\perp} \subset F_1^{\perp}$. For $1 \leq i \leq n-2$, the intersection $\mathbb{P}(F_i)^{\perp} \cap Q$ is a smooth hypersurface in $\mathbb{P}(F_i^{\perp})$. It is a basis for $H_{4n-2i-2}(Q)$, or for $H^{2i-2}(Q)$.</p>
<p>The remaining case is middle cohomology; $H_{2n-2}(Q)$. The recipe of the first paragraph would suggest taking $\mathbb{P}(F_n)$; the recipe of the second paragraph would suggest taking $\mathbb{P}(F_{n-1}^{\perp}) \cap Q$. In fact, these two classes together form a basis for the two dimensional space $H_{2n-2}(Q)$, but there is a better way to think about it. The quadratic form $Q$, restricted to $F_{n-1}^{\perp}$, has kernel $F_{n-1}$, and hence descends to a nondegenerate pairing on $F_{n-1}^{\perp}/F_{n-1}$. A symmetric nondegenerate bilinear form on a $2$-dimensional vector space has precisely two isotropic subspaces. One of them is $F_n/F_{n-1}$. Call the other one $F'_n/F_{n-1}$, so $F'_n$ is another isotropic plane sitting between $F_{n-1}$ and $F_{n-1}^{\perp}$. Then $(\mathbb{P}(F_n), \mathbb{P}(F'_n))$ form a basis for $H_{2n-2}(Q)$. From the above description, we see that $\mathbb{P}(F_{n-1}^{\perp}) \cap Q = \mathbb{P}(F_n) \cup \mathbb{P}(F'_n)$.</p>
<p>The Bruhat cells are just formed by taking each Schubert variety and removing the smaller Schubert varieties inside it.</p>
<p>In my opinion, it would be best to define a complete isotropic flag to consist of the data $F_1 \subset F_2 \subset \cdots \subset F_{n-2} \subset F_n, F'_n$. (Note that we can recover $F_{n-1}$ as $F_n \cap F'_n$.) If you notice that the containments between these subspaces look like the $D_n$ Dynkin diagram, that's not a coincidence...</p>
<p><hr>
$\def\Span{\mathrm{Span}}$
<b>ADDED</b> It might help to write all of this out for $Q$ given by $x_1 x_8 + x_2 x_7 + x_3 x_6 + x_4 x_5$. Let $F_1 = \Span(e_1)$, $F_2 = \Span(e_1, e_2)$, $F_3 = \Span(e_1, e_2, e_3)$ and $F_4 = \Span(e_1,e_2,e_3, e_4)$. So $F_i^{\perp} = \Span(e_1, e_2, \ldots, e_{8-i})$ and $F'_4 = \Span(e_1, e_2, e_3, e_5)$. </p>
<p>The Bruhat cells (also known as Schubert cells) are
$$(1:0:0:0:0:0:0:0)$$
$$(t:1:0:0:0:0:0:0)$$
$$(t:u:1:0:0:0:0:0)$$
$$(t:u:v:1:0:0:0:0) \ \mbox{and} \ (t:u:v:0:1:0:0:0)$$
$$(t:u:-wx:w:x:1:0:0)$$
$$(t:-vy-wx:v:w:x:y:1:0)$$
$$(-uz-vy-wx:u:v:w:x:y:z:1)$$</p>