the topology of arithmetic progressions of primes - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-18T04:48:15Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/104059http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/104059/the-topology-of-arithmetic-progressions-of-primesthe topology of arithmetic progressions of primesVidit Nanda2012-08-05T22:42:20Z2012-09-01T19:57:25Z
<p>The primary motivation for this question is the following: I would like to extract some topological statistics which capture how arithmetic progressions of prime numbers "fit together" in a manner that will be made precise below. </p>
<h2>Setup</h2>
<p>Consider a nested family of simplicial complexes $K(p)$ indexed by prime $p \in \mathbb N$ defined as follows: </p>
<ol>
<li>the vertices are all primes less than or equal to $p$, and</li>
<li>insert a $d$-simplex ($d \geq 2$) spanning $d+1$ vertices if and only if they constitute an arithmetic progression. Of course, one must also insert all faces, and faces-of-faces etc. so that the defining property of a simplicial complex is preserved.</li>
</ol>
<p>For instance, $K(7)$ has the vertices $2,3,5,7$ and a single $2$-simplex $(3,5,7)$ along with all its faces. $K(11)$ has all this, plus the vertex $11$ and the simplex $(3,7,11)$. The edge $(3,7)$ already exists so only the other two need to be added. Thus, the fact that $(3,7)$ occurs in two arithmetic progressions bounded by $11$ is encoded by placing the corresponding edge in the boundary of two simplices.</p>
<h2>Question</h2>
<p>Has someone already defined and studied this complex? What I am mostly interested in is</p>
<blockquote>
<p>How does the homology of $K(p)$ change with $p$?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It is easy to check that the only interesting homology is in dimensions $ \leq 1$. If it helps, here are -- according to home-brew computations -- the statistics for the first few primes (Betti 0 and 1 over $\mathbb{Z}_2$). I've already confirmed that the sequence of Betti-1's is not in Sloane's online encyclopedia of integer sequences. If an intermediate K[p] is missing in the list, that means that the homology is the same as that for the previous prime.</p>
<h2>Update 1##</h2>
<p>Zack pointed out an error in the previous computations, so here are the betti numbers with that error fixed. I have also removed "2" from the vertex set since the only contribution of that vertex to the homology is incrementing all the $0$ dimensional betti numbers by +1.</p>
<p>K [3]: 1 0<br>
K [5]: 2 0<br>
K [7]: 1 0<br>
K [13]: 2 0<br>
K [17]: 2 1<br>
K [19]: 1 2<br>
K [23]: 1 4<br>
K [31]: 1 6<br>
K [37]: 2 6<br>
K [43]: 1 7<br>
K [53]: 1 8<br>
K [59]: 1 9<br>
K [61]: 1 10<br>
K [67]: 1 12<br>
K [71]: 1 17<br>
K [73]: 1 20<br>
K [79]: 1 23<br>
K [83]: 1 26<br>
K [89]: 1 31<br>
K [97]: 1 32<br>
K [101]: 1 35<br>
K [103]: 1 41<br>
K [107]: 1 43<br>
K [109]: 1 47<br>
K [113]: 1 53<br>
K [127]: 1 58<br>
K [131]: 1 62<br>
K [137]: 1 67<br>
K [139]: 1 73<br>
K [149]: 1 78 </p>
<h2>Update 2</h2>
<p>I've just finished running the homology computations (over $\mathbb{Z_2}$) for all primes less than $30,000$, and <a href="https://dl.dropbox.com/u/74531549/prime_30k_betti.txt" rel="nofollow">this text file</a> contains the resulting Betti numbers. Once such data is available for control experiments, such as Cramer numbers or primes which are $1$ mod 4, I will put up those text files as well. Also, I am no longer confident that higher homology will not appear, so here is an auxiliary question:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Is it true that the higher homology groups of $K(p)$ are trivial?</p>
</blockquote>