Reference Request: de Rham vs. Dolbeault - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-06-19T08:41:59Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/102983http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/102983/reference-request-de-rham-vs-dolbeaultReference Request: de Rham vs. DolbeaultAlex Gavrilov2012-07-24T06:49:49Z2012-07-24T08:05:15Z
<p>Hi everyone.
I need the following statement: </p>
<p>For a Kahler manifold $X$, the natural map
<code>$H^n(X,\mathbb{C})\to H^n(X,\mathcal{O})$</code>
(from the sheaf extension) coincides with the Hodge
projection $\Pr_{0,n}$, up to the de Rham isomorphism
and the Dolbeault isomorphism. </p>
<p>Does anybody know a good reference?</p>
<p>P.S. Surely there must be a reference. I am much less interested in proofs:
I think I know one. </p>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/102983/reference-request-de-rham-vs-dolbeault/102985#102985Answer by diverietti for Reference Request: de Rham vs. Dolbeaultdiverietti2012-07-24T07:45:37Z2012-07-24T08:05:15Z<p>There are lots of references. Mainly every textbook which treats Hodge theory. Try to look at:</p>
<ul>
<li>Voisin: Hodge theory and complex algebraic geometry. I</li>
<li>Huybrechts: Complex geometry</li>
<li>Wells: Differential analysis on complex manifolds</li>
<li>Griffiths, Harris: Principles of algebraic geometry</li>
</ul>
<p>There, you will find mainly the proof in the case $n=2$, which is used to prove the Lefschez theorem on $(1,1)$-classes. The general case is a straightforward adaptation of that argument.</p>