Maximal class of simple graphs of order $n$ with mutually distinct numbers of spanning trees - MathOverflow most recent 30 from http://mathoverflow.net2013-05-23T05:24:07Zhttp://mathoverflow.net/feeds/question/100816http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/rdfhttp://mathoverflow.net/questions/100816/maximal-class-of-simple-graphs-of-order-n-with-mutually-distinct-numbers-of-spaMaximal class of simple graphs of order $n$ with mutually distinct numbers of spanning treesJernej2012-06-27T22:26:53Z2012-07-06T09:37:06Z
<p>This problem in some ways related to <a href="http://mathoverflow.net/questions/93656/minimal-graphs-with-a-prescribed-number-of-spanning-trees" rel="nofollow">this</a> post.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Let $A_n$ be the set of all integers $x$ such that there exist a connected simple graph of order $n$ having precisely $x$ spanning trees. Study the growth rate of $|A_n|.$ </p>
</blockquote>
<p>The question was raised by J.Sedlacek in his paper entitled: <em>On the number of spanning trees of finite graphs, Cas. Pro. Pest Mat., Vol. 94 (1969) 217-221.</em> </p>
<p>Sedlacek was able to show that $|A_n| = \omega(n)$ and remarked that it is not known if $|A_n| = \omega(n^2).$</p>
<p>Following are some observations about $|A_n|.$</p>
<ol>
<li><p>Clearly $|A_n| \leq n^{n-2}$ and $|A_n| \leq |A_{n+1}|$</p>
<ul>
<li>Playing with prime partitions a bit it is possible to show that</li>
</ul>
<p>$$ |A_n| = \omega(\sqrt{n}e^{\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{3}}\sqrt{n/\log{n}}}) $$</p>
<ul>
<li>The following table can be computed using sage+nauty:</li>
</ul></li>
</ol>
<p>$$\begin{array}{ccc}
n & |A_n| & \frac{n^{n-2}}{|A_n|}\\
1 & 1 & 1 \\
2 & 1 & 1 \\
3 & 2 & 1.5 \\
4 & 5 & 3.2 \\
5 & 16 & 7.8 \\
6 & 65 & 19.9\\
7 & 386 & 43.5\\
8 & 3700 & 70.8 \\
9 & 55784 & 85.7\\
10 & 1134526 & 88.1 \\
11 & 27053464 & 87.1 \\
\end{array}
$$</p>
<p>The bound mentioned under 2. was obtained using a construction of graphs with cut vertices. Since almost all graphs are blocks it is (in a way) reasonable to ask</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Question.</strong> Is there a construction (using blocks)
that can improve bound 2.?</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I believe that this should also be provable:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Conjecture.</strong> $|A_n| = \omega(k^n)$ for all $k \in \mathbb{N}.$</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In case this turns out to be a hard problem I would at least like to extend table 3. further. I am currently computing $|A_n|$ by generating all connected graphs of order $n$ with at least $n$ edges, computing their spanning trees and count distinct such numbers. One optimization could be derived by using the fact that $A_n \subset A_{n+1}$ but this is just a minor thing. I therefore leave the following question for the end:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Question.</strong> How can we compute $|A_n|$ quickly?</p>
</blockquote>
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/100816/maximal-class-of-simple-graphs-of-order-n-with-mutually-distinct-numbers-of-spa/100823#100823Answer by Igor Pak for Maximal class of simple graphs of order $n$ with mutually distinct numbers of spanning treesIgor Pak2012-06-28T00:02:52Z2012-06-28T00:02:52Z<p>I don't have an answer to your asymptotics question, but I do have an idea how to approach your problem. Consider a graph $\Gamma=\Gamma(G_1,\ldots,G_k,H)$, where $H$ is a simple graph on $k$ vertices, where $\Gamma$ is obtained by making $G_i$ to be "parts" and connecting every vertex in $G_i$ with every vertex in $G_j$ if $(i,j)\in H$. This construction generalizes a multipartite graphs and hopefully should give you a better asymptotics if you set up the induction right. </p>
<p>Define $F_G(z) = \sum_r f(G,r) z^r$, where $f(G,r)$ is the number of rooted spanning forests in $G$ with $r$ roots. This way $F_G(0)$ is $n$ times the number of spanning trees in $G$, and $F_G(1)$ is the number of spanning trees in $\widehat G$, defined as a vertex connected to all $v\in G$. Turns out, $F_\Gamma$ is a product of $F_{G_i}$ and $F_H$ with appropriate substitutions. See <a href="http://www.math.ucla.edu/~pak/papers/PP-trees-journal.pdf" rel="nofollow">this</a> really short note, and <a href="http://www.math.ucla.edu/~pak/papers/KPP-volume.ps" rel="nofollow">this preprint</a> which explains it better. </p>