-2
$\begingroup$

Let $T:X\rightarrow Y$ be a linear continuous map between Banach spaces $X$ and $Y$ and denote by $T':Y'\rightarrow X'$ the norm adjoint of $T$. Let $M\subseteq U'$ be a subset of the unit sphere $U'$ of $Y'$. Let $C\subseteq M$ be any weak*-closed convex subset. Is the image $T'(C)$ weak*-closed in $X'$? Or more generally, assuming that $C$ is convex, under which additional conditions on $C$ is the image $T'(C)$ weak*-closed in $X'$?

$\endgroup$
11
  • $\begingroup$ I have forgotten to mention that we can also assume that $T'$ is injective on $M$! $\endgroup$
    – Andy Teich
    Jun 13, 2012 at 8:56
  • $\begingroup$ Do you really mean the sphere, or do you mean the ball? Convex subsets of spheres might not be very big... $\endgroup$
    – Yemon Choi
    Jun 13, 2012 at 9:03
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, it I really mean the sphere. Think of $Y'$ as being an $L^1$-space... $\endgroup$
    – Andy Teich
    Jun 13, 2012 at 9:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ This is very similar to a question here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/157069/… $\endgroup$ Jun 13, 2012 at 12:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Peter: No; but if you look on this site, you'll see that it's generally considered good to cross-link. You probably wouldn't know that as a new user, so I thought I'd highlight this for you. $\endgroup$ Jun 13, 2012 at 12:27

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

When you say that $C$ is weak* closed I'm not sure whether you mean as a subset of $Y'$ or in the relative weak* topology on $M$. If the latter, the answer is obviously "no": take $T$ to be the identity map and let $C = M$ be a convex subset of the unit sphere which is not weak* closed. (Examples are easy to find, even in finite dimensions.) If the former, the answer is "yes", for then $C$ is a weak* closed subset of the closed unit ball, hence it is weak* compact, hence its image under a weak* continuous map (which $T'$ is) must also be weak* compact, and hence weak* closed.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ If I understand you correctly, it also would suffice to assume that $M$ itself is weak*-closed...? $\endgroup$
    – Andy Teich
    Jun 13, 2012 at 12:45
  • $\begingroup$ Weak* compact (which is the same as weak* closed, if it's bounded). $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Jun 13, 2012 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ So it is sufficient to assume that $C$ is weak*-closed and $M$ is weak*-closed. Is it also necessary to have that $C$ is weak*-closed?Can we give conditions on $C$, $M$ or $T'$ to have that for any $C\subseteq M$ the image $T'(C)$ is weak*-closed in $X'$? $\endgroup$
    – Andy Teich
    Jun 13, 2012 at 13:26
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Since the question is changing, maybe you'd better edit your original post to clarify what it is you really want. $\endgroup$
    – Nik Weaver
    Jun 13, 2012 at 13:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.