5
$\begingroup$

Given a factor M (=von Neumann alg. with center ℂ), let us write BIM for the ⊗-C*-category of M-M-bimodules.

Which ⊗-C*-categories can one faithfully embed into BIM?

⓵ Are there necessary conditions for a ⊗-C*-category to be representable in BIM?
⓶ Are there sufficient conditions for a ⊗-C*-category to be representable in BIM?

Comment:
I suspect that a lot is known about ⓶ in relation with the theory of planar algebras...
I specially care about ⓵: are there examples of ⊗-C*-categories that don't embed?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

5
$\begingroup$

I don't know about necessary conditions, but here are some results concerning sufficient conditions:

  • In MR1749868, Hayashi and Yamagami realize amenable $C^*$-tensor categories in the category of bifinite (Jones index) bimodules of the hyperfinite $II_1$-factor.-
  • In arXiv:0811.1764v4, Stefaan Vaes and Sébastien Falguières showed that "the representation category of any compact group is the [bifinite] bimodule category of a $II_1$-factor," i.e., given a compact group $G$ with representation category $C$, there is a $II_1$-factor $M$ whose category of bifinite bimodules is exactly $C$.-
  • Recently, Sven Raum and Sébastien Falguières showed that "all finite $C^*$-tensor categories are [bifinite] bimodule categories of a $II_1$-factor," i.e., given a finite $C^*$-tensor category $C$, there is a $II_1$-factor $M$ whose category of bifinite bimodules is exactly $C$. This paper has yet to appear on the arXiv. Here is the link to the conference at which the talk was given.-

I don't know of such results for type $III$ factors.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ This is only an answer to half of my question. But it is very informative, so I'll accept it. $\endgroup$ Jul 18, 2011 at 12:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.