1
$\begingroup$

A collection of triangles with a common vertex $A_1VA_2$, $A_2VA_3$, ... $A_NVA_1$ with specified side lengths can be isometrically embedded in $R^2$ provided the angles around $V$ add up to $2\pi$. If they do not however, I believe this can still be embedded in $R^3$ with one exception: $N=3$ and sum of the angles $>2\pi$. My question is: does this generalize to tetrahedra embedded in $R^4$? I expect that it does with a possible exception of 4 tetrahedra with solid angles adding to $>4\pi$. Would the answer be any different if the euclidian $R^4$ was replaced with $R^4$ with Minkowski metric (-,+,+,+)? Can you point me to some literature on the subject?

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

7
$\begingroup$

Your belief is false: if any one of the angles is greater than the sum of all the others, then the triangles can't be embedded in $\mathbb{R}^3$.

$\endgroup$
0
4
$\begingroup$

This is not an answer to you question and I am sure you question (once it is formulated correctly) does not have a complete answer.


The embeddings of a collection of triangles with a common vertex is the same as an embedding of a graph in $S^2$.

The same way, the embedding of a collection of tetrahedra with a common vertex can be reformulated as embedding spherical polyhedral space into $S^3$. The embeddings into $\mathbb R^{3,1}$ correspond to embeddings of hyperbolic polyhedral space into Lobachevsky 3-space.

I think the most interesting theorem about this is Alexandrov's embedding theorem --- the theorem usually formulated for embedding of polyhedral spaces in to $\mathbb R^3$, but it was also proved for embedding of spherical polyhedral spaces to $S^3$ as well as for embedding hyperbolic polyhedral space into Lobachevsky 3-space.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.