3
$\begingroup$

Suppose that $f : X \rightarrow Y$ is mapping between topological spaces that is not continuous at $x_0$. Then there is an open set $V$ in $Y$ containing $f(x_0)$ such that for any open set $U$ containing $x_0$, there is some $x_U \in U$ with $f(x_U) \notin V$. By picking one from each $U$ we can build a net $x_U$ converging to $x_0$ such that $f(x_U)$ does not converge to $f(x_0)$. This however requires the axiom of choice because we have to pick $x_U$ from each $U$.

My question is: if we are given that a function between topological spaces is continuous if and only if it is "sequentially" continuous (in the sense of nets, not necessarily infinite sequences indexed by the integers) - does the axiom of choice follow?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

11
$\begingroup$

The axiom of choice is not needed if $X$ is $T_1$; i.e., singleton sets are closed.

Suppose $f:X\to Y$ is not continuous at $x_0$. Let $D$ be the collection of all $(U,x)$ s.t. $U$ is an open set containing both $x_0$ and $x$ and $x_0\not=x$. Say that $(U,x) \le (V,y)$ provided $V\subset U$ and $x$ is not in $V$. If $X$ is $T_1$, this is a directed set. Define a net $g$ with domaine $D$ by $g(U,x)=x$. Then $g$ converges to $x_0$ but $f(g)$ does not converge to $f(x_0)$.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ This is a nice example where you avoid picking an element (maybe because you just cannot, in the absence of choice!) and solve the problem by using all possible choices---like someone wanted in another question. $\endgroup$ Dec 25, 2010 at 21:53
  • $\begingroup$ This is a good answer. I am still interested in the other direction. The proof that Tychonoff's theorem, or that every vector space has a basis imply the axiom of choice - I find very fascinating and I wonder if similar techniques can be applied in this case. $\endgroup$
    – mathahada
    Dec 26, 2010 at 14:35
  • $\begingroup$ @mathahad: The usual proof that $f$ is continuous at $x_0$ implies that $f(g)$ converges to $f(x_0)$ whenever $g$ is a net converging to $x_0$ does not use the axiom of choice. Maybe you mean something different? $\endgroup$ Dec 26, 2010 at 18:29
  • $\begingroup$ I know. My question is if the following are equivalent: 1. Axiom of choice 2. For every mapping $f : X -> Y$ that is not continuous at $x_0$ there is a net converging to $x_0$ that does not converge to $f(x_0)$ It is not hard to prove that 1 implies 2. As you have shown, to prove 2 you don't even have to assume 1 if the space is $T_1$ (the question however is not settled for arbitrary topological spaces) $\endgroup$
    – mathahada
    Dec 28, 2010 at 8:48
  • $\begingroup$ Actually you do not need $T_1$. For the directed set, take the same underlying set, but order it differently: $(U,x)< (V,y)$ provided $U$ is a proper subset of $V$. The net $g$ is the same. This order gives a directed set as long as $x_0$ does not have a smallest open neighborhood, which is a case that is easy to treat separately. $\endgroup$ Dec 28, 2010 at 18:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.