4
$\begingroup$

Let $\xi_t$ be a zero-mean gaussian process on $[0,1]$ with covariance operator $C$. I would like to better understand the relation between the covariance operator and the regularity of the trajectories.

I already know that

Theorem (Kolmogorov) If there exists $\alpha>1,C\geq 0$ and $\epsilon>0$ such that $$E[|\xi_t-\xi_s|^{\alpha}] \leq C > |t-s|^{1+\epsilon}$$ then there exists a modification of the process that is almost surely Hölder-$\delta$ for $\delta\in ]0,\epsilon/\alpha[$.

I would like to know if there are other results in this direction (with other spaces than Holder ?) and especially one that relates directly a norm (spectral norm under stationnarity assumption ?) of the covariance operator and the regularities of the trajectories.


note: if I remember there is a link between the closure of the cameron martin space and the support of the gaussian measure associated to the process... how can I reformulate this to answer my question ? )

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

2
$\begingroup$

Suppose we already know that the process is continuous with probability one, so that the process takes values in the Banach space $X = C([0,1])$ with distribution $\mathbb P$. The covariance operator $C : X^* \to X$ is then a map from the dual space $X^*$ to $X$. The support of the Gaussian measure $\mathbb P$ is then the closure of the image of $X^*$ under $C$: $$\operatorname{supp} \mathbb P = \overline{ CX^* }.$$ (This is the main theorem of [Vakhania 1975])

Now let's construct the Cameron-Martin space. The operator $C$ defines an inner product on the dual space $X^*$ by $$\langle f, g \rangle = f(Cg)$$ for $f, g \in X^*$. The space $X^*$ isn't necessarily closed under the topology induced by the inner product, so let $H$ be the Hilbert space completion, and let $\iota : X^* \hookrightarrow H$ be the inclusion map. Define a map $\iota^* : H \hookrightarrow X$ first on the dense subspace $\iota X^* \subseteq H$ by $$\iota^*(\iota f) = Cf,$$ and extend continuously to all of $H$. Thus the covariance operator factors as $C = \iota^* \circ \iota$.

The Hilbert space $\iota^* H$ is a subspace of $X$, and is called the Cameron-Martin space of the process. Interpreting this in the context of the support of the Gaussian measure $\mathbb P$, we have $$\operatorname{supp} \mathbb P = \overline{\iota^* H},$$ so that the closure of the Cameron-Martin space (with respect to the original norm of $X$) is exactly the support of $\mathbb P$.

I go into these ideas in more detail in Section 2 of my preprint [LaGatta 2010].

Suppose your covariance operator is an integral operator with kernel $c(s,t)$, called the covariance function of the process. That is, if $\mu$ is a Radon measure on $[0,1]$, then $$(C\mu)(s) = \int_0^1 c(s,t) \, d\mu(t).$$

If we write $c_s(t) = c(s,t)$, then the support of $\mathbb P$ is the closure of the span of the functions $c_s$ in $C([0,1])$. So to answer your question: if you know that the closure $\overline{\operatorname{span}\{c_s\}}$ is a space with regularity property $P$, then the process $\xi_t$ satisfies property $P$ with probability one.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Tom this is very clearly developping my note to answer the question ! I could have a further question such as "how far can we extend the idea with the kernel replacing the kernel function by a kernel distribution" but I'll read the preprint first. $\endgroup$ Aug 13, 2010 at 11:26
  • $\begingroup$ Glad to help, Robin. I always enjoy your questions. Don't focus too much on the last paragraph I wrote, discussing covariance functions. I included that only to make the abstract formalism a little more concrete. All the functional analysis works as long as you have a covariance operator C. The important statement that you want to focus on is the first equation I posted: $\operatorname{supp} \mathbb P = \overline{CX^*}$. $\endgroup$ Aug 13, 2010 at 13:19
2
$\begingroup$

Hi Robin

You should have a look to the following reference :

Adler - Introduction to Continuity, Extrema, and other Topics of Gaussian Processes

Best Regards

$\endgroup$
0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.