10
$\begingroup$

We all know that $\sum_{i=0}^{n}{n \choose i}=2^{n}$. Is there a similar result regarding the q-binomial coefficients? (a.k.a Gaussian binomial coefficients) - $\sum_{i=0}^{n}{n \choose i}_{q}=?$

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I think that you need to define your normalizations before stating the question. What is your definition of $[n]_q?$ $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2012 at 7:54

4 Answers 4

11
$\begingroup$

The identity $\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (1+xq^i) = \sum_{k=0}^n x^k q^{{k\choose 2}}{n\choose k}_q$ is the $q$-binomial theorem. A combinatorial proof based on integer partitions is mentioned on page 68 of Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1, 2nd ed. There is also given a combinatorial proof based on finite fields. For the online version at http://math.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/ec1.pdf, see pages 74-75.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Is it the answer? $\endgroup$ Commented May 7, 2016 at 10:52
7
$\begingroup$

There are many possibilities, e.g. $\sum_{i=0}^{n}q^i{n \choose i}_{q^2}=(1+q)(1+q^2)...(1+q^n)$

or

$\sum_{i=0}^{n}q^{i(i+1)/2}{n \choose i}_{q }=(1+q)(1+q^2)...(1+q^n).$

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ That's interesting. Do you know a bijective proof of these identities, based on the fact that the Gaussian binomial coefficient is the number of subspaces of dimension $i$ in $(\mathbb{Z}/q)^n$? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2012 at 10:38
  • $\begingroup$ I know no direct bijective proofs of this sort. The second identity can be deduced from a polynomial identity which has a bijective proof in the setting of finite vector spaces, cf. Goldman - Rota, Finite vector spaces and Eulerian generating functions, Studies in Appl. Math. XLIX (3), 1970. $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 1, 2012 at 12:36
  • $\begingroup$ The second one is the q-binomial theorem en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… evaluated at $t=q$. The first one is exercise 99 in the book "Integer Partitions" by Andrews and Eriksson, 2004, but no solution is given. Is there a similar conceptual approach? $\endgroup$
    – azimut
    Commented Nov 20, 2023 at 14:16
7
$\begingroup$

For Gaussian binomial coefficients we have $$ \sum_{k = 0}^n \binom nk_q = \sum_{m = 0}^\infty a_m q^m, $$ where $$ a_m = \sum_{\lambda\vdash m} \#\{k\in \mathbf Z_{\geq 0}\mid \lambda_1\leq n-k, \lambda'_1\leq k\}. $$ The notation $\lambda\vdash m$ signifies that $\lambda$ is an integer partition of $m$. Also $\lambda_1$ is the first (largest) part of $\lambda$ and $\lambda'_1$ is the number of positive parts in $\lambda$.

This follows from the following well-known fact about Gaussian binomial coefficients: $$ \binom nk_q = \sum_\lambda q^{|\lambda|}, $$ the sum being over all partitions $\lambda$ where $\lambda_1\leq n-k$ and $\lambda'_1\leq k$ (see, for example Stanley's Enumerative Combinatorics, vol. 1, or Eq. (4) in my expository article titled Counting subspaces in a Finite Vector Space).

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

One more version - analog of $\sum_{i=0}^n(-1)^i\binom ni=0$: $$ \sum_{i=0}^n(-1)^i\binom ni_q=\begin{cases}0,&n=2k-1\\ \prod_{j=1}^k(1-q^{2j-1}),&n=2k\end{cases} $$

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ Could you sketch a proof of this, or give a reference? $\endgroup$
    – aleph
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 21:52
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @aleph It was proved by Gauss in his "Summatio Quarumdam Serierum Singularium", section 6. Here is a link: eudml.org/doc/203313. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 1, 2023 at 21:01
  • $\begingroup$ @LucasCuller Many thanks for this reference! $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 4:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ A proof is found on pages 71/72 in the book "Integer Partitions" by Andrews and Eriksson, 2004. They call it the "Gaussian formula". $\endgroup$
    – azimut
    Commented Nov 15, 2023 at 6:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .