8
$\begingroup$

Let $A:H\to L^0(S, \mu)$ be a continuous operator from a Hilbert space to the space of (equivalence classes of) measurable functions on a probability measure space $S$ with convergence in measure. Let's say that $A$ is canonical if it is the natural inclusion of $L^2(S, \nu)$ into $L^0(S, \mu)$, where $\nu$ is a $\sigma$-finite measure equivalent to $\mu$. The question is whether every operator $A:H\to L^0$ can be factored like $A=BC$ with $B$ canonical and $C$ bounded between Hilbert spaces.

$\endgroup$
9
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ If you are asking this question, you must know that the answer is yes if you replace $L_0$ by $L_p$, $1\le p <2$, which can be found in books (e.g. Albiac-Kalton and Diestel-Jarchow-Tonge). In fact, the $L_p$ case for $p<1$ and the $L_0$ case were treated by Bernard Maurey in his thesis and early papers, but these results have not, I think, found their way into books. (You can reduce the $L_0$ case to the case of $L_p$ for some or any $p<1$ via Nikishin's theorem, which in one form--maybe stated by Maurey; I don't remember--says that every operator from a Banach space into $L_0$ factors.... $\endgroup$ May 30, 2012 at 20:39
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ through the canonical injection from $L_p$ into $L_0$ for arbitrary $p<1$. $\endgroup$ May 30, 2012 at 20:43
  • $\begingroup$ A continuous operator $B\to L^0$ factors through $L^1(\nu)$ for some $\nu\sim\mu$ whenever $B$ a separable Banach space. The "standard" proof of the Bichteler-Dellacherie theorem in the literature uses a lemma which is essentially a statement of this. On the other hand, I think I can construct continuous operators $\ell^p\to L^1$ which do not factor through any $L^p(\nu)$, for each $p > 1$. I'll have to think about this a bit more and post an answer when I have time. $\endgroup$ May 31, 2012 at 10:33
  • $\begingroup$ George, you are claiming that a famous problem in Banach space theory is solved by a standard proof. The problem is whether a Banach space that embeds into $L_0$ must embed into $L_1$. However, an isomorphism from $L_1$ (or even $\ell_1$) into $L_0$ cannot factor through an injection from $L_1$ into $L_0$, which is to say that the injection from $L_1$ into $L_0$ is not an isomorphism when restricted to any isomorphic copy of $\ell_1$. $\endgroup$ May 31, 2012 at 13:48
  • $\begingroup$ Similarly, it is also known that for $p<2$, the injection from $L_p$ to $L_0$ (or to $L_r$ with $r<p$) is not an isomorphism when restricted to any subspace isomorphic to $\ell_p$. This version can be found in Albiac-Kalton. Basically the reason is that any copy of $\ell_p$ in $L_p$ with $p$ not $2$ contains a normalized sequence that is a small perturbation of a disjoint sequence. $\endgroup$ May 31, 2012 at 13:54

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

Yes, it is true that every such operator factors through a canonical map.

Theorem: Let $(\Omega,\mathcal{F},\mathbb{P})$ be a probability space and $A\colon H\to L^0(\mathbb{P})$ be a continuous linear operator. Then, there exists a probability measure $\mathbb{Q}$ equivalent to $\mathbb{P}$ such $A$ factors into continuous operators $A=BC$ for $B\colon L^2(\mathbb{Q})\to L^0(\mathbb{Q})=L^0(\mathbb{P})$ the natural inclusion.

From the comments, it seems like Bill Johnson has a reference for this, or a reference to results from which it follows. However, I'll write out my own proof too, based on the following two facts.

Theorem A: There exist universal constants $K,\delta > 0$ such that, for any $a\in\ell^2$ and IID sequence of Rademacher random variables $\epsilon_0,\epsilon_1,\ldots$ then, $$ \mathbb{P}\left(\left(\sum_n\epsilon_na_n\right)^2\ge K\sum_na_n^2\right)\ge\delta. $$

Theorem B: Let $\mathcal{U}$ be a convex subset of $L^1(\mathbb{P})$ which is bounded in probability. Then, there exists an $X\in L^\infty(\mathbb{P})$ such that $X > 0$ almost surely, and $$ \left\lbrace \mathbb{E}[XU]\colon U\in\mathcal{U}\right\rbrace $$ is bounded.

Theorem A is a kind of Khintchine inequality, which I previously discussed in my answer to this question and in this question. Theorem B is a consequence of the Hahn-Banach theorem and the fact that the dual of $L^1(\mathbb{P})$ is $L^\infty(\mathbb{P})$. By setting $\mathbb{Q}=X\cdot\mathbb{P}$ it can be seen that it is equivalent to the existence of a probability measure $\mathbb{Q}\sim\mathbb{P}$ for which $\lbrace\mathbb{E}\_{\mathbb{Q}}[U]\colon U\in\mathcal{U}\rbrace$ is bounded. This does not imply that $\mathcal{U}$ is a bounded subset of $L^1(\mathbb{Q})$, although this implication does hold when $\mathcal{U}$ is a collection of nonnegative random variables. I'm familiar with this result, because it is used in a common proof of the Bichteler-Dellacherie theorem classifying semimartingales, and I'll refer to Protter, Stochastic Integration and Differential Equations for the proof of Theorem B (Section III.9 Lemma 3 in the second edition, although the numbering seems to have changed in Version 2.1).

Theorem A can be used to prove the following.

Lemma: Let $A\colon H\to L^0(\mathbb{P})$ be a continuous operator from Hilbert space $H$ and $B_1\subseteq H$ be the closed unit ball. Then, ${\rm conv}(A(B_1)^2)$ is bounded in probability.

Here, $\rm conv$ refers to the convex hull, and it can be seen that $$ {\rm conv}(A(B_1)^2)=\left\lbrace\sum_n(Av_n)^2\colon\sum_n\Vert v_n\Vert^2\le1\right\rbrace, $$ where the $v_n$ range over the eventually zero sequences in $H$.

Proof: Note that $A(B_1)^2$ is automatically bounded in probability by continuity of $A$. This does not, in general, imply that the convex hull is bounded in probability, because $L^0(\mathbb{P})$ need not be locally convex. So, Theorem A will be needed.

Let $\epsilon_0,\epsilon_1,\ldots$ be an IID sequence of Radamacher random variables defined on some probability space $(S,\mathcal{S},\mu)$. Also, let $K,\delta$ be as in Theorem A. Then, for any $L > 0$ and eventually zero sequence $v_n\in H$ with $\sum_n\Vert v_n\Vert^2\le1$, $$ \begin{align} &\int\mathbb{P}\left(\left(\sum_n\epsilon_nAv_n\right)^2\ge L\right)\,d\mu\cr &\ge\int\mathbb{P}\left(\left(\sum_n\epsilon_nAv_n\right)^2\ge K\sum_n(Av_n)^2\ge L\right)\,d\mu\cr &=\mathbb{E}\left[\mu\left(\left(\sum_n\epsilon_nAv_n\right)^2\ge K\sum_n(Av_n)^2\right)1_{\lbrace K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L\rbrace} \right]\cr &\ge\delta\mathbb{P}\left( K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L\right). \end{align} $$ We also have $$ \int\biggl\lVert\sum_n\epsilon_nv_n\biggr\rVert^2\,d\mu=\sum_n\lVert v_n\rVert^2\le1. $$ The first inequality above implies that $$ \begin{align} \mathbb{P}\left(\left(\sum_n\epsilon_nAv_n\right)^2\ge L\right)\ge\frac\delta2\mathbb{P}\left( K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L\right)&&{\rm(1)} \end{align} $$ for $\epsilon$ in a subset of $S$ with $\mu$-probability at least $\frac\delta2\mathbb{P}\left( K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L\right)$. For any $M > 0$ the second inequality implies that $$ \begin{align} \biggl\lVert\sum_n\epsilon_nv_n\biggr\rVert^2\le M&&{\rm(2)} \end{align} $$ on a set of $\mu$-probability at least $1-1/M$. So, if $1/M$ is less than $\frac\delta2\mathbb{P}(K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L)$ then there exists a sequence $\epsilon_n\in\lbrace\pm1\rbrace$ for which both (1) and (2) hold. Taking $M^{-1}=\frac\delta3\mathbb{P}(K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L)$, $$ \mathbb{P}\left( K\sum_n (Av_n)^2\ge L\right)\le\frac2\delta\sup_{X\in A(B_1)^2}\mathbb{P}\left(MX\ge L\right). $$ Letting $f(y)$ be the supremum of $\mathbb{P}(Y\ge y)$ over $Y\in{\rm conv}(A(B_1)^2)$ we need to show that $f(y)\to0$ as $y\to\infty$. Taking $L=Ky$ in the inequality above, $$ f(y)\le\frac2\delta\sup_{X\in A(B_1)^2}\mathbb{P}\left(X\ge\frac\delta3Kyf(y)\right). $$ If $f(y)\not\to0$ then the right hand side of this inequality would tend to zero by boundedness in probability of $A(B_1)^2$, giving $f(y)\to0$. QED

Proof of Theorem: Let $\mathcal{U}$ be the set of $U\in L^1(\mathbb{P})$ with $0\le U\le Y$ for some $Y\in{\rm conv}(A(B_1)^2)$. This is convex and, by the lemma above, it is bounded in probability. So, by Theorem B, there exists $K > 0$ and a probability measure $\mathbb{Q}\sim\mathbb{P}$ such that $\mathbb{E}\_{\mathbb{Q}}[U]\le K^2$ for all $U\in\mathcal{U}$. So, by monotone convergence, for any $v\in H$ with $\Vert v\Vert\le1$, $$ \mathbb{E}\_{\mathbb{Q}}[(Av)^2]=\lim_{n\to\infty}\mathbb{E}\_{\mathbb{Q}}[\min(n,(Av)^2)]\le K^2. $$ This shows that the map $C\colon H\to L^2(\mathbb{Q})$ given by $Cv=Av$ is bounded with $\Vert C\Vert\le K$, and $A$ factors as required. QED

$\endgroup$
0
0
$\begingroup$

Here is a nice exposition due to Maurey:

http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/fitem?id=SAF_1972-1973____A10_0 http://www.numdam.org/numdam-bin/fitem?id=SAF_1972-1973____A11_0

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.