4
$\begingroup$

The question is motivated by a more broad perspective in another MO post and here, but here we would like to understand a specific case (our question potentially connects to / is motivated b Quantum Gravity).

Question: We would like to know whether there exists a finite (here six) dimensional Lie algebra which provides a symmetric invariant bilinear non-degenerate metric? $$ \omega_{ab}\equiv {\begin{pmatrix} \Omega_{h_i, h_j} & a_{i}\;\mathbb{I}\\ a_{i}\;\mathbb{I} & 0 \end{pmatrix}} $$ With $\Omega_{h_i, h_j}\equiv {\begin{pmatrix} 2b_1 & c_{12}& c_{13} \\ c_{12} & 2b_2 & c_{23} \\ c_{13} & c_{23} & 2b_3 \end{pmatrix}}$, and $a_{i}\mathbb{I}\equiv {\begin{pmatrix} a_1 &0 &0 \\ 0 &a_2 &0 \\ 0& 0& a_3 \end{pmatrix}}$ (Here $a_1,a_2,a_3$ all are positive numbers. $b_1,b_2,b_3,c_{12},c_{13},c_{23}$ are either positive numbers or zeros.) if yes, what is this Lie algebra? The commutation rules? Is it semi-simple Lie algebra or non-semi-simple? nilpotent or not, solvable or non-solvable Lie algebra?


extra INFO:

NOTE: A specific case we had worked out (but which unfortunately whose Lie algebra does not provide the desired $\omega_{ab}$) is the doubled extension of $\mathcal{G}$ by $\mathcal{h}$. The full vector space is $\mathcal{G}\oplus \mathcal{h}\oplus \mathcal{h}^*$. Here the subalgebra is spanned by the Abelian extension of $\mathcal{G}$ by $\mathcal{h}^*$: i.e. $\mathcal{G}\oplus \mathcal{h}^*$. The full algebra is the semi-direct product of $\mathcal{h}$ by this Abelian extension, $\mathcal{G}\oplus \mathcal{h}^*$. This is the doubled extension: $\mathcal{G}\oplus \mathcal{h}\oplus \mathcal{h}^*$. Also $\mathcal{h}^*$ is the dual to $\mathcal{h}$. This Lie algebra is studied in the literature before. Use this non-semi-simple type Lie algebra $\mathcal{G}\oplus \mathcal{h}\oplus \mathcal{h}^*$, we can find a type of bilinear form as: $$ \Omega_{ab} = {\begin{pmatrix} \Omega_{g_i, g_j} &0 &0 \\ 0 & \Omega_{h_i, h_j} & \mathbb{I}\\ 0 & \mathbb{I} & 0 \end{pmatrix}} $$ each blocks is spanned by generators of $\mathcal{G}$, $\mathcal{h}$, $\mathcal{h}^*$ respectively. But $\Omega_{ab}$ this does not provide us the desired form as $\omega_{ab}$. I suppose we find the Lie algebra by ${f_{ai}}^k\omega_{jk}+{f_{aj}}^k\omega_{ik}=0$ and here $\omega_{ik}=\omega_{ki}$ symmetric for this given $\omega_{ab}$. Say here $[X_i,X_j]={f_{ij}}^k X_k+\dots$.

  • Lastly pardon that our understanding is more based on the theoretical physics side. We do have PhDs and do some research works. But our math accents are unfortunately not canonical/orthodox. Please feel free to comment/reply/correct/provide Ref for us. (if you vote down, please provide useful/rational comments on why/how to improve our post.) Thank you.
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ ps. as mentioned in the maintext, if you vote down, please leave your name and provide useful/rational comments on why/how to improve our post. Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – miss-tery
    Dec 29, 2013 at 20:16

1 Answer 1

4
$\begingroup$

If I understand your question correctly, then $\mathfrak{g} \ltimes \mathfrak{g}^*_{\textrm{abelian}}$, for $\mathfrak{g}$ any three-dimensional real Lie algebra, has an invariant inner product of this type. This is the semidirect product of $\mathfrak{g}$ with its coadjoint representation treated as an abelian Lie algebra.

In the generic case, you would have to take the matrix $\Omega = 0$, but for some particular Lie algebras you can allow nontrivial (positive-semidefinite) $\Omega$. For example, if you take $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{su}(2)$, then you can let $\Omega$ be any (non-positive) multiple of the Killing form.

Since you mentioned the language of double extensions, this is just the double extension of the trivial zero-dimensional Lie algebra by $\mathfrak{g}$.

Added

Let me try to help with the digestion by writing the structure constants explicitly in terms of a basis. Choose a basis $(X_i)$ for $\mathfrak{g}$ and let $(\alpha^i)$ denote the canonically dual basis for $\mathfrak{g}^*$. Then the structure constants for $\mathfrak{g} \ltimes \mathfrak{g}^*_{\textrm{abelian}}$ relative to this choice of basis are given by: $$ [X_i, X_j] = f_{ij}{}^k X_k \qquad\qquad [X_i,\alpha^j] = - f_{ik}{}^j \alpha^k \qquad\qquad [\alpha^i,\alpha^j] = 0 $$

This choice is such that the $a_i$ are all equal. If you are prescribing the $a_i$ ab initio then you don’t have to choose the canonical dual basis for $\mathfrak{g}^*$: rescaling them should do the trick.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ THANK you, Prof. José Figueroa-O'Farrill for the nice comments. Let me digest. ps. I enjoy reading many of your inspiring classic hep-th papers. :) $\endgroup$
    – miss-tery
    Dec 29, 2013 at 7:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.